SEAT Mii MOT Results

Registered in 2016
81.7% pass rate
from 2,289 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Mii is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.7% fail on Visibility (69% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.70% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.70% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.17% fail on Stop lamp (72% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.087% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.087% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.044% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.044% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.087% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.087% fail on Horn
    • 0.044% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.044% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.044% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.044% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.044% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 2.4% fail on Tyres (37% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.96% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Size/type
  • 2.1% fail on Brakes
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.087% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.044% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.70% fail on Mechanical brake components (63% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake linings and pads (70% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Brake pads (70% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.22% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.044% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.044% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.26% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.17% fail on Lever
    • 0.044% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.044% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.044% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (87% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (95% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.044% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.044% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system (31 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (38 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Tank
    • 0.044% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.044% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.044% fail on Transmission
      • 0.044% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.044% fail on Joints
    • 0.044% fail on Body
      • 0.044% fail on Other body component
  • 0.48% fail on Suspension (77% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Springs (89% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Coil spring (89% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension arms (73% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.087% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.044% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.087% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 0.22% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.17% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.087% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.087% fail on Condition
    • 0.087% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.087% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.044% fail on Condition
    • 0.044% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • SEAT Mii (2012 - 2019)
    A quality product, low running costs, decent level of refinement, zesty little engine, easy to drive.

    Search Good Garages