SEAT Mii MOT Results
Registered in 201681.7% pass rate
from 2,289 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Mii is unusually good or bad.
-
6.7% fail on
Visibility
(69% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Wipers (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Washers
-
0.13% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.13% fail on Windscreen
-
3.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.70% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.70% fail on Headlamp
- 0.35% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.17% fail on Stop lamp (72% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.087% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.087% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.044% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.044% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.087% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.087% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.087% fail on Horn
-
0.044% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.044% fail on Position lamp
-
0.044% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.044% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.044% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.044% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.4% fail on
Tyres
(37% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.96% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Size/type
-
2.1% fail on
Brakes
-
1.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.044% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.044% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(63% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Brake pads (70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.22% fail on Brake discs
-
0.044% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.044% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
0.48% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.17% fail on Lever
-
0.044% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.044% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.044% fail on Electronic stability control
-
1.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(87% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(95% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.044% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.044% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(95% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(180% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
(31 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (38 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Tank
- 0.044% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.044% fail on Bumpers
-
0.044% fail on
Transmission
-
0.044% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.044% fail on Joints
-
0.044% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.044% fail on
Body
- 0.044% fail on Other body component
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
(31 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Suspension
(77% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Springs
(89% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Coil springs
(89% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Coil spring (89% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Coil springs
(89% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Suspension arms
(73% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.044% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.087% fail on Ball joint
- 0.044% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.087% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.13% fail on
Springs
(89% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.22% fail on Registration plates
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.087% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.087% fail on Condition
- 0.087% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.087% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.087% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.044% fail on Condition
- 0.044% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Mii (2012 - 2019)
A quality product, low running costs, decent level of refinement, zesty little engine, easy to drive.