SEAT Leon MOT Results
Registered in 200859.8% pass rate
from 6,843 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Leon is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
7.8% fail on
Springs
(31% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Coil springs
(32% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Coil spring (32% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Mounting
-
0.015% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.015% fail on Spring saddle
-
7.8% fail on
Coil springs
(32% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(83% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Ball joint
- 0.088% fail on Linkage (62% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.044% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
2.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(41% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Ball joint (60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Pins and bushes (73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.029% fail on Suspension arm (86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers (39% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Wheel bearings (40% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.044% fail on Ball joint
-
0.16% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.029% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint
-
0.044% fail on
Sub-frames
(90% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.015% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint
-
7.8% fail on
Springs
(31% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(18% better than other 2008 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
(25% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (30% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp (19% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamps
(25% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp (28% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.015% fail on Matched pair
- 0.015% fail on Dipswitch
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (34% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Direction indicators
(66% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Flashing type
(66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Individual direction indicators (63% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Side repeaters (68% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.73% fail on
Flashing type
(66% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.44% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.44% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.34% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.20% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.088% fail on Horn (66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.12% fail on Position lamp
-
0.044% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.044% fail on Switch
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
(25% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
10% fail on
Brakes
-
5.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(23% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
(24% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance (29% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.044% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.029% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.015% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
(24% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.015% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt
- 0.82% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.10% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.044% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.058% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.044% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.015% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.015% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.015% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt
-
0.58% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(23% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(21% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(33% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads (32% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Brake linings
-
1.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
-
0.16% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.12% fail on Cable
- 0.029% fail on Lever
- 0.015% fail on Linkage
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(33% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (63% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.26% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.029% fail on Master cylinder (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Servos
- 0.015% fail on Valves
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake control
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Lever (67% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.088% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(77% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Pedal
- 0.044% fail on Hand lever (81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.029% fail on Leaks
- 0.029% fail on Servos
-
5.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(38% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Transmission
(77% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Joints (78% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Drive shaft (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.13% fail on Joints
-
4.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system (33% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Doors
-
0.35% fail on
Other passenger's door
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Door condition (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Catch
-
0.12% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.12% fail on Door condition
-
0.058% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.058% fail on Door condition
-
0.35% fail on
Other passenger's door
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.015% fail on Tank
- 0.015% fail on Pipe
- 0.015% fail on System
-
0.12% fail on
Body
- 0.088% fail on Panel
- 0.029% fail on Other body component
- 0.058% fail on Bumpers
- 0.058% fail on Undertray
-
0.044% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(83% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (81% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.044% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.044% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.029% fail on
Chassis
- 0.029% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.015% fail on
Load security
- 0.015% fail on Tailgate
-
0.015% fail on
Seats
- 0.015% fail on Driver's seat
-
4.8% fail on
Transmission
(77% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(36% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(41% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(24% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (44% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.63% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.073% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.073% fail on Catalytic converter (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
3.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(85% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.89% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (93% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Emission control equipment
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Catalytic converter (14 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.015% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.058% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.058% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
4.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(24% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Fluid leaks
(56% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.015% fail on Other leaks
-
0.044% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.029% fail on Sound deadening material
- 0.015% fail on Undertray
-
7.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(41% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Tyres
- 4.5% fail on Tread depth (23% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Condition
- 0.088% fail on Size/type (64% better than other 2008 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Visibility
(16% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Washers
- 1.8% fail on Wipers (38% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
View to rear
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors
- 0.015% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.058% fail on Bonnet (71% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.044% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.029% fail on Windscreen
- 0.015% fail on Window
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(68% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Seat belts
(67% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Requirements
- 0.029% fail on Prescribed areas (90% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.088% fail on
Airbags
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.015% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.85% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(59% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Registration plates (60% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Steering
(76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Ball joint
- 0.25% fail on Electronic power steering (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Steering gear
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.38% fail on Attachment
- 0.058% fail on Condition
-
0.029% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.029% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Leon (2005 - 2013)
Stylish design. Excellent road manners. Roomy and well-equipped cabin. An easy car to live with and enjoy. Superb value. FR models are the best.