SEAT Leon MOT Results

Registered in 2000

56.6% pass rate

from 152 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Leon is unusually good or bad.

16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.6% fail on Direction indicators
  - 4.6% fail on Flashing type
    - 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
- 3.3% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.6% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.66% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.66% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.66% fail on Position lamp
- 0.66% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.66% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
14% fail on Brakes
- 5.9% fail on Brake performance
  - 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.9% fail on Rbt
      - 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 3.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 2.6% fail on Rbt
      - 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.6% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.3% fail on Brake discs
- 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 1.3% fail on Electronic stability control
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
  - 1.3% fail on Lever
- 0.66% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.66% fail on Pedal
- 0.66% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.66% fail on Servos
- 0.66% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.66% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
9.9% fail on Suspension
- 4.6% fail on Springs
  - 4.6% fail on Coil springs
    - 4.6% fail on Coil spring
- 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
  - 3.9% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.66% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.66% fail on Linkage
- 0.66% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.66% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.66% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.66% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.66% fail on Sub-frame
9.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 9.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 8.6% fail on Spark ignition
    - 7.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.66% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.66% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.66% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.66% fail on Other leaks
7.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 3.3% fail on Transmission
  - 3.3% fail on Drive shafts
    - 3.3% fail on Joints
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.66% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.66% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.66% fail on Chassis
  - 0.66% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.66% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.66% fail on Pipe
- 0.66% fail on Doors
  - 0.66% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.66% fail on Door condition
6.6% fail on Steering
- 3.3% fail on Steering gear
  - 3.3% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 3.3% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.66% fail on Ball joint
- 0.66% fail on Power steering
  - 0.66% fail on Other components
5.9% fail on Visibility
- 4.6% fail on Washers
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
3.9% fail on Tyres
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth
3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.3% fail on Seat belts
  - 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates