SEAT Ibiza MOT Results

Registered in 2015
74.5% pass rate
from 18,561 tests in 2021
(31% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Ibiza is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.9% fail on Visibility (100% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers (66% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Washers (180% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.097% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.054% fail on View to rear
      • 0.054% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.022% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.011% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0054% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.0054% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (29% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (23% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Reversing lamps (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Reversing lamps (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Reversing lamp switch (25 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Stop lamp (58% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Direction indicators (55% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Flashing type (55% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Side repeaters (65% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.0054% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.075% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Horn
      • 0.011% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.075% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (69% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.048% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.0054% fail on Switch
    • 0.038% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.011% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0054% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.0054% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.0054% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.0054% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 5.7% fail on Brakes (61% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0054% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0054% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0054% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.91% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.086% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance (74% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (71% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance (60% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.043% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.0054% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.011% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.011% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0054% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.065% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.0054% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.97% fail on Brake discs and drums (59% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Brake discs (57% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Brake drums (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Rod (84 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on Cable
    • 0.69% fail on Parking brake control (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Pedal
    • 0.15% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.092% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.0054% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.043% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.032% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.011% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.011% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0054% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres (24% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth (40% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Size/type
  • 4.0% fail on Suspension (24% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms (98% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover (81% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Springs (48% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Coil springs (48% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Coil spring (49% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Mounting
    • 0.63% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage ball joints (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0054% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0054% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.62% fail on Shock absorbers (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Wheel bearings (100% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.027% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.011% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.022% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0054% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.022% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0054% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0054% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.011% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.0054% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.0054% fail on Other components
    • 0.0054% fail on Axles
      • 0.0054% fail on Axle
  • 0.98% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.92% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.80% fail on Spark ignition (24% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.36% fail on Catalyst emissions (61% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0054% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.12% fail on Compression ignition (73% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.0054% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.0054% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.048% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.016% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.0054% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.011% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.011% fail on Undertray
  • 0.59% fail on Body, chassis, structure (37% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.14% fail on Transmission (63% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Drive shafts (61% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints (65% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Drive shaft (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Seats
      • 0.038% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.027% fail on Body
      • 0.022% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0054% fail on Panel
    • 0.027% fail on Doors
      • 0.016% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0054% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0054% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0054% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0054% fail on Door condition
    • 0.022% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.022% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.022% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.0054% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0054% fail on Bracket
    • 0.0054% fail on Undertray
  • 0.52% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (38% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (100% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0054% fail on Requirements
    • 0.016% fail on Airbags
      • 0.011% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0054% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.32% fail on Steering
    • 0.20% fail on Steering linkage components (39% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Track rod end (62% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Drag link end (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Steering arm (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.065% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.065% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.038% fail on Steering play (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Power steering
      • 0.0054% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.0054% fail on Other components
    • 0.011% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.26% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.26% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment
    • 0.016% fail on Condition
  • 0.0054% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0054% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • SEAT Ibiza (2008 - 2017)
    Cheap to run. five star Euro NCAP rating, clear and simple dash layout. Facelifted with improved engine range from spring 2012.

    Search Good Garages