MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » SEAT » Ibiza » 2005

SEAT Ibiza MOT Results

Registered in 2005
48.5% pass rate
from 6,675 tests in 2017
(14% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Ibiza is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Condition
      • 0.015% fail on Presence
    • 7.6% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Front drive shafts (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Couplings
        • 0.015% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.075% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.075% fail on Drive shafts
    • 6.3% fail on Coil springs (24% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Condition (22% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Location (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.78% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.76% fail on Wheel bearings (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Front
      • 0.37% fail on Rear (59% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Front suspension joints (40% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.090% fail on Bonded suspension (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Prescribed areas (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Component mounting (87% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.045% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.015% fail on Condition
    • 0.045% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.045% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.030% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.015% fail on General condition
    • 0.015% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.015% fail on Condition
    • 0.015% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment
  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.9% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Position lamps (48% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Front lamps (49% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear lamps (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.015% fail on Switch
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (48% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (46% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (44% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.015% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.015% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.015% fail on Switch
    • 0.82% fail on Direction indicators (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Flashing type (72% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters (40% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Individual lamps (84% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Tell tales (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on All direction indicators (90% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Fog lamp (65% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.15% fail on Horn (68% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Battery (83% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.060% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.045% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.030% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.015% fail on Lamp
      • 0.015% fail on Tell tale
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Rear wheels (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Front wheels (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.030% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.5% fail on Parking brake (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (36% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Components (55% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.21% fail on Cylinders (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Reservoirs (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Pipes (96% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on Servos (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Operation
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components (36% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (43% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Brake discs (34% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake drums (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.060% fail on Wheel cylinder (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.015% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.0% fail on ABS
    • 0.43% fail on Air and vacuum systems (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Components (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Servos (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Hoses
      • 0.030% fail on Leaks (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Operation
      • 0.015% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.37% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.090% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.060% fail on Mechanical components (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Cable (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Lever
      • 0.015% fail on Clevis joint
    • 0.045% fail on Service brake control components (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Pedal (73% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Condition
        • 0.015% fail on Anti-slip
  • 11% fail on Tyres (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Tread depth (21% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Condition (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
    • 0.16% fail on Valve stem
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers (42% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Washers (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.090% fail on Mirrors (69% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 6.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (27% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Emissions (67% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.66% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.45% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on System (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Pipe
      • 0.015% fail on Cap
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering system
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.40% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.28% fail on Steering arm (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Free play
        • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.030% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.015% fail on Steering damper
    • 0.37% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
      • 0.060% fail on Operation
      • 0.060% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.045% fail on Rams
      • 0.030% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.12% fail on Steering operation
  • 2.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers other (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Drivers
    • 0.87% fail on Body condition (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Seats (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers
    • 0.060% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.060% fail on Chassis
    • 0.060% fail on Body security
    • 0.015% fail on Load security
      • 0.015% fail on Tailgate
  • 1.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (28% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.090% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.54% fail on Seat belts (50% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas (63% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Requirements
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment
  • 0.90% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.90% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 0.090% fail on Condition
  • 0.015% fail on Towbars
    • 0.015% fail on Detachable tow ball
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages