SEAT Ibiza MOT Results
Registered in 200349.5% pass rate
from 2,128 tests in 2021
(11% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Ibiza is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
(19% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.094% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.094% fail on Linkage
-
5.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.9% fail on Pins and bushes (75% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Ball joint (65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.52% fail on Suspension arm
-
5.8% fail on
Springs
(46% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Coil springs
(49% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Coil spring (48% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Mounting (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Coil springs
(49% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.52% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.19% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.047% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (95% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.047% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(110% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 7.8% fail on Stop lamp (70% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.094% fail on Headlamp levelling device (81% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.89% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.047% fail on Switch
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.61% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.33% fail on Horn
- 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.094% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.23% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(83% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(83% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(83% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.19% fail on Position lamp
- 0.094% fail on Rear reflectors
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(44% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Transmission
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Joints (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.14% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.14% fail on Joints
-
7.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.8% fail on
Doors
(190% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Other passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Front passenger's door
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Door condition (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.28% fail on Door condition
-
1.0% fail on
Other passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Seats
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Passenger's seat (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.42% fail on
Body
- 0.28% fail on Panel
- 0.14% fail on Other body component
-
0.14% fail on
Fuel system
(74% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Hose
- 0.047% fail on Pipe
- 0.047% fail on System
-
0.14% fail on
Load security
(16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Tailgate
(20 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Tailgate condition (25 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Tailgate
(20 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Undertray
-
0.094% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(90% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (89% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.094% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.047% fail on
Chassis
- 0.047% fail on Chassis condition
-
8.0% fail on
Transmission
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(71% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(74% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(91% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (92% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.047% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.70% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.047% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.047% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(91% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.23% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.19% fail on Other leaks
- 0.047% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(74% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(19% better than other 2003 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(42% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
(46% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (46% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (78% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
(46% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(50% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(53% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (96% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(53% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(41% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (37% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 0.94% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.047% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.047% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.047% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(42% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(41% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.66% fail on Brake discs
- 0.19% fail on Brake drums (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(58% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Brake pads (57% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.094% fail on Lever
- 0.047% fail on Cable
-
0.85% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.14% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.047% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.61% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.47% fail on Hand lever
- 0.14% fail on Pedal
- 0.56% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.47% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Brake fluid (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.047% fail on Valves
-
0.47% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.42% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.33% fail on Rigid brake pipes (91% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Leaks (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up (19 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Servos
- 0.094% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.047% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.047% fail on Other components
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Visibility
(31% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Washers (75% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Wipers
-
0.14% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.14% fail on Windscreen
-
0.14% fail on
View to rear
- 0.094% fail on Mirrors
- 0.047% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.047% fail on Driver's view
- 0.047% fail on Bonnet
-
9.0% fail on
Tyres
(52% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Tread depth (45% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Condition (84% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Size/type
-
4.7% fail on
Steering
-
3.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.3% fail on Track rod end
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.047% fail on Drag link end
-
0.047% fail on
Other components
- 0.047% fail on Steering component
-
0.56% fail on
Power steering
- 0.19% fail on Operation
- 0.19% fail on Other components
- 0.094% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.094% fail on Rams
-
0.33% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.33% fail on Steering rack
- 0.28% fail on Electronic power steering (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.52% fail on
Seat belts
(70% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas (78% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.2% fail on Registration plates
-
0.19% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.094% fail on Condition
- 0.094% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Ibiza (2002 - 2009)
More interesting looking than a Polo. 1.8 petrol turbo FR good fun.