SEAT Ibiza MOT Results
Registered in 200253.0% pass rate
from 778 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Ibiza is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Suspension
-
7.2% fail on
Springs
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Mounting
-
7.2% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint
- 1.0% fail on Suspension arm (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
5.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.77% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.51% fail on Ball joint
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.13% fail on Linkage
- 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (62% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.26% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.26% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.26% fail on Other suspension component
-
7.2% fail on
Springs
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.26% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.90% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.64% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.90% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.90% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.90% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.51% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.39% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.13% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.13% fail on Position lamp
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(28% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Transmission
-
5.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.9% fail on Joints
- 0.13% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.13% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.13% fail on Joints
-
5.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.2% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Front passenger's door
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Other passenger's door
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Front passenger's door
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Body
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Panel (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Other body component
-
0.64% fail on
Seats
- 0.39% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.26% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.51% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.51% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.13% fail on
Chassis
- 0.13% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.13% fail on
Towbar
- 0.13% fail on Towbar condition
-
5.1% fail on
Transmission
-
11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(53% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(57% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
(69% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (79% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (65% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.26% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.13% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.13% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
0.77% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.26% fail on
Emission control equipment
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Catalytic converter (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.13% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.26% fail on
Emission control equipment
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
(69% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.77% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.13% fail on Other leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(57% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Brakes
(38% better than other 2002 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
- 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
-
2.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (90% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(47% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt
- 0.77% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.26% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.13% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
- 0.13% fail on Brake drums
-
0.13% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.13% fail on Lever
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.90% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.90% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.51% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.39% fail on Hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Pedal
-
0.39% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.39% fail on Lever
-
0.26% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.13% fail on Servos
- 0.13% fail on Valves
- 0.26% fail on Rigid brake pipes (93% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.26% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.13% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.13% fail on Servos
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
5.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.1% fail on
Tyres
(42% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Tread depth
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 0.64% fail on Size/type
-
8.0% fail on
Visibility
- 4.1% fail on Wipers
- 3.9% fail on Washers
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
-
0.13% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.13% fail on Windscreen
-
3.7% fail on
Steering
-
2.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.3% fail on Track rod end
-
1.2% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
-
0.13% fail on
Power steering
- 0.13% fail on Other components
-
0.13% fail on
Steering play
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
- 0.13% fail on Electronic power steering
-
2.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.13% fail on Requirements
-
0.26% fail on
Airbags
- 0.26% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.77% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.77% fail on Registration plates
-
0.26% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.13% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Ibiza (2002 - 2009)
More interesting looking than a Polo. 1.8 petrol turbo FR good fun.