SEAT Ibiza MOT Results
Registered in 200049.6% pass rate
from 857 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Ibiza is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 6.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 6.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.5% fail on Front lamps
- 0.82% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.12% fail on All position lamps
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
-
3.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.70% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.58% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.82% fail on Battery
-
0.82% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.70% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.12% fail on Switch
- 0.23% fail on Horn
- 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
- 6.4% fail on Rear wheels (56% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Front wheels
- 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.70% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.70% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.12% fail on Brake operation
-
4.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.1% fail on
Components
- 2.0% fail on Hoses
- 1.5% fail on Pipes (63% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Cylinders (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Valves
- 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.82% fail on Leaks
-
4.1% fail on
Components
-
2.2% fail on
Hub components
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
- 0.12% fail on Brake discs
- 0.12% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 0.82% fail on ABS
- 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.23% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.23% fail on
Pedal
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.23% fail on
Pedal
-
0.23% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.23% fail on
Components
- 0.23% fail on Servos (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Components
- 0.12% fail on Electronic stability system
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(36% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Emissions (53% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Exhaust system (44% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.23% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.12% fail on Pipe
- 0.12% fail on Cap
-
14% fail on
Suspension
(37% better than other 2000 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.35% fail on Attachment
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
2.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Location
-
2.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
(61% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.93% fail on Component mounting (77% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(57% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(56% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (56% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(56% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(72% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.35% fail on Linkage condition
-
1.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.70% fail on
Wheel bearings
(63% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Front
- 0.12% fail on Rear
-
0.35% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.35% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.12% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.12% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Axles
- 0.12% fail on Axle beam
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension arms
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 1.8% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Windscreen
- 0.35% fail on Bonnet
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(33% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Tread depth (59% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Size/type
- 0.23% fail on Valve stem
-
7.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(52% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Seat belts
(89% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Requirements
-
1.3% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
6.4% fail on
Seat belts
(89% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(57% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Passengers other (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Passengers front (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Body condition
-
0.58% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.58% fail on Chassis
-
0.58% fail on
Seats
- 0.35% fail on Drivers
- 0.23% fail on Passengers
-
2.8% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Steering
-
3.2% fail on
Steering system
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end
- 1.5% fail on Steering rack
- 0.23% fail on Ball joint
- 0.23% fail on Steering operation
-
0.12% fail on
Steering control
- 0.12% fail on Steering column
- 0.12% fail on Locking devices
-
3.2% fail on
Steering system
-
0.93% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.93% fail on Registration plate
-
0.23% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Attachment