SEAT Ibiza MOT Results

Registered in 2000
49.6% pass rate
from 857 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Ibiza is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.82% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.70% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.58% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.82% fail on Battery
    • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.70% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.12% fail on Switch
    • 0.23% fail on Horn
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.4% fail on Rear wheels (56% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.70% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.12% fail on Brake operation
    • 4.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.1% fail on Components
        • 2.0% fail on Hoses
        • 1.5% fail on Pipes (63% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Cylinders (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Valves
        • 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.82% fail on Leaks
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.12% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.12% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.9% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.82% fail on ABS
    • 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.23% fail on Pedal
        • 0.12% fail on Condition
        • 0.12% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.23% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.23% fail on Components
        • 0.23% fail on Servos (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (36% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Emissions (53% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust system (44% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.23% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on Pipe
      • 0.12% fail on Cap
  • 14% fail on Suspension (37% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Location
    • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas (61% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.93% fail on Component mounting (77% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts (57% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Front drive shafts (56% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (56% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.70% fail on Wheel bearings (63% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Front
      • 0.12% fail on Rear
    • 0.35% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.12% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Axles
      • 0.12% fail on Axle beam
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.8% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.35% fail on Bonnet
  • 11% fail on Tyres (33% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Tread depth (59% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
    • 0.23% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (52% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Seat belts (89% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
      • 0.23% fail on Requirements
    • 1.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 5.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (57% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Passengers other (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Passengers front (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition
    • 0.58% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.58% fail on Chassis
    • 0.58% fail on Seats
      • 0.35% fail on Drivers
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers
  • 3.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.2% fail on Steering system
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.23% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.12% fail on Steering control
      • 0.12% fail on Steering column
    • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.93% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.93% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages