SEAT Cordoba MOT Results

Registered in 2005
45.8% pass rate
from 118 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Cordoba is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (45% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 13% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 5.1% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Tell tale
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Rear reflectors (28 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 30% fail on Suspension (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 15% fail on Anti-roll bars (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Coil springs
      • 6.8% fail on Condition
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.85% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.85% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.85% fail on Rear
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 5.9% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.85% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 3.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake calipers (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.85% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.85% fail on Cable
    • 0.85% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.85% fail on Components
        • 0.85% fail on Hoses
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 7.6% fail on Condition
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.85% fail on Size/type
  • 6.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
  • 5.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Doors (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Passengers other (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.85% fail on Body condition
  • 4.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.85% fail on Cap
    • 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering system
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.85% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.85% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages