SEAT Cordoba MOT Results

Registered in 2004
49.7% pass rate
from 197 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Cordoba is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Position lamps (87% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 10% fail on Front lamps (89% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Rear lamps
    • 8.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Fog lamp (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.51% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.51% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.51% fail on Lamp
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 6.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.0% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 6.6% fail on Coil springs
      • 6.6% fail on Condition
      • 0.51% fail on Location
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.51% fail on Attachment
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.51% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.51% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.1% fail on Rear wheels (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.0% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.0% fail on Components (79% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Pipes
        • 0.51% fail on Hoses
      • 0.51% fail on Leaks
    • 1.0% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 1.0% fail on ABS
  • 9.1% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Condition
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 8.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
  • 3.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on System
    • 0.51% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.5% fail on Steering system
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.51% fail on Power steering
      • 0.51% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 2.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.51% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.51% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.5% fail on Doors
      • 1.5% fail on Passengers other (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Body condition
  • 0.51% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.51% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages