SEAT Cordoba MOT Results

Registered in 2004
49.7% pass rate
from 143 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Cordoba is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.70% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 5.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.70% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.70% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.70% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.70% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.70% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.70% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 9.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.70% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 6.3% fail on Springs
      • 6.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 6.3% fail on Coil spring
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.70% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.70% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (76% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 10% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 10% fail on Drive shafts (200% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 10% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Body (11 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Panel (15 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Other body component (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Doors (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Other passenger's door (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front passenger's door (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.70% fail on Pipe
      • 0.70% fail on System
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 9.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt
          • 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 4.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.70% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.70% fail on Cable
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.70% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.70% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.70% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.70% fail on Lever
    • 0.70% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.70% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.70% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 8.4% fail on Tyres
    • 7.0% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.70% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.70% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint
  • 4.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.70% fail on Attachment
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.70% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.70% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages