SEAT Cordoba MOT Results

Registered in 1998
50.8% pass rate
from 65 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Cordoba is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 4.6% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 6.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 6.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Springs
      • 1.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.5% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.5% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 12% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Joints
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 9.2% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
          • 9.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 7.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal
      • 1.5% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.5% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.7% fail on Compression ignition (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (12 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Emissions not tested (17 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 9.2% fail on Visibility
    • 6.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Bonnet
    • 1.5% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.5% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plates
    • 1.5% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 4.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.5% fail on Drag link end
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.5% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.5% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages