MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » SEAT » Arosa » 2002

SEAT Arosa MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.4% pass rate
from 682 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Arosa is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.88% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies) (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.88% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.29% fail on Switch
    • 0.29% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.15% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 6.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.5% fail on Springs
      • 3.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.88% fail on Linkage
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (17 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.59% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.59% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.44% fail on Axles
      • 0.29% fail on Axle (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.44% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (34% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Transmission (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Drive shafts (64% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Joints (61% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.73% fail on Doors
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.44% fail on Door condition
      • 0.29% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
        • 0.15% fail on Hinge
    • 0.59% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.44% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
    • 0.59% fail on Seats
      • 0.59% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.44% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.44% fail on Body
      • 0.29% fail on Other body component
      • 0.15% fail on Panel
    • 0.15% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.15% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.29% fail on Plate brake tester (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (58% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (56% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.88% fail on Rbt
          • 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.29% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.0% fail on Load sensing valves (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal
      • 0.44% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.44% fail on Lever
    • 0.44% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.29% fail on Servos (23 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Valves
    • 0.29% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.15% fail on Leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Servos
    • 0.29% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (76% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (82% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.59% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.15% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.44% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.44% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 2.1% fail on Steering (51% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.88% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.73% fail on Steering linkage components (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Track rod end (72% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Power steering
      • 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.29% fail on Other components
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (72% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Seat belts (86% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Airbags
      • 0.29% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.44% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.44% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.15% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages