SEAT Arosa MOT Results
Registered in 199855.0% pass rate
from 500 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Arosa is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.0% fail on Front lamps
- 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
-
3.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.2% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.60% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 1998 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Battery
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp
- 1.8% fail on Horn (170% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.6% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
- 6.0% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.4% fail on Front wheels
- 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.40% fail on Brake imbalance
-
4.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.4% fail on
Components
- 2.2% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Hoses
- 0.80% fail on Pipes (79% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Servos
- 0.40% fail on Leaks
-
4.4% fail on
Components
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake
(190% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Hub components
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
-
0.60% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(11 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Components
(18 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Servos (27 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Components
(18 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.60% fail on ABS
- 0.40% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.20% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.20% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(26% better than other 1998 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Rear (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Front
-
3.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.40% fail on Condition
-
3.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
(55% better than other 1998 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Component mounting (54% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.20% fail on Spring mounting
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(72% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.20% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.80% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Front drive shafts
(81% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Constant velocity joints (80% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Front drive shafts
(81% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Coil springs
(81% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Condition (80% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.20% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
5.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.0% fail on Emissions
- 6.0% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.40% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.20% fail on Cap
- 0.20% fail on System
-
9.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.8% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Mirrors
- 0.80% fail on Windscreen
-
8.6% fail on
Tyres
- 4.4% fail on Condition
- 3.6% fail on Tread depth
- 0.40% fail on Valve stem
- 0.20% fail on Size/type
-
3.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
2.2% fail on
Doors
(200% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Passengers front (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Body condition
-
0.20% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.20% fail on Chassis
-
2.2% fail on
Doors
(200% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(55% better than other 1998 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.40% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
(73% better than other 1998 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Steering system
(67% better than other 1998 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Track rod end
-
0.20% fail on
Free play
- 0.20% fail on Steering box
-
1.2% fail on
Steering system
(67% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.40% fail on Condition