SEAT Altea MOT Results
Registered in 201057.3% pass rate
from 1,548 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Altea is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(56% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(190% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint
- 0.065% fail on Linkage
-
9.6% fail on
Springs
(77% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Coil springs
(77% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Coil spring (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Coil springs
(77% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.065% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.065% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.065% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.065% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.065% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(190% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(27% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Brake performance
(53% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(99% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.065% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.065% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(51% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 0.97% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.065% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.065% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.065% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.065% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
-
0.39% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.39% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.065% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.39% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(99% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(46% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(62% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Brake pads (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
0.065% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.065% fail on Cable
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(62% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.78% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.39% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.065% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.13% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.065% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.065% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.065% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
6.1% fail on
Brake performance
(53% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(22% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
(44% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp (49% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.45% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.45% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.45% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.39% fail on
Direction indicators
(81% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators (75% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.39% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.13% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.13% fail on Horn
-
0.065% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.065% fail on Position lamp
-
0.065% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.065% fail on Switch
- 0.065% fail on Rear reflectors
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
8.4% fail on
Tyres
(39% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Condition (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Size/type
-
5.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(42% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Exhaust system (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Transmission
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.3% fail on Joints
- 0.065% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.065% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.065% fail on Joints
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.84% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Front passenger's door
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.13% fail on Door condition
-
0.39% fail on
Front passenger's door
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.065% fail on Pipe
- 0.065% fail on Bumpers
-
0.065% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.065% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.065% fail on
Body
- 0.065% fail on Other body component
-
0.065% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.065% fail on Other boot lid component
- 0.065% fail on Undertray
-
5.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(49% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(50% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(150% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.065% fail on Other leaks
-
4.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(50% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Visibility
- 2.7% fail on Washers
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
- 0.065% fail on Bonnet
-
0.065% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.065% fail on Windscreen
-
0.065% fail on
View to rear
- 0.065% fail on Mirrors
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.90% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.39% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.39% fail on Condition
-
0.19% fail on
Airbags
(11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.52% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.52% fail on Registration plates
-
0.26% fail on
Steering
(89% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.19% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Attachment
- 0.065% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Altea (2004 - 2015)
Roomy cabin with a decent boot. Distinctive styling. Excellent crash test rating.