SEAT Altea MOT Results
Registered in 200958.1% pass rate
from 1,928 tests in 2021
(9.6% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Altea is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(25% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Springs
(54% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Coil springs
(55% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Coil spring (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Mounting
-
8.9% fail on
Coil springs
(55% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.52% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Linkage
- 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.052% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.052% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.052% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(43% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes (74% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers (93% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.41% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.052% fail on Ball joint
-
0.052% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
8.9% fail on
Springs
(54% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(63% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamps
(46% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp (46% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(45% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
(45% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.21% fail on Side repeaters (71% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
(45% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (55% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.62% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.62% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.36% fail on
Position lamps
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Position lamp (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.21% fail on Switch
-
0.21% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.10% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.10% fail on Horn
-
0.16% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.16% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.052% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.052% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(63% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(20% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Brake performance
(40% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(74% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
(75% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.052% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.052% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
(75% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.93% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.88% fail on
Rbt
- 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.052% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.052% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.052% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.88% fail on
Rbt
-
0.57% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.52% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.052% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.052% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.52% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(74% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(49% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Brake pads (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
0.10% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.10% fail on Cable
-
3.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(49% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(76% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.62% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.26% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.16% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.10% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Leaks
- 0.052% fail on Servos
-
0.052% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.052% fail on Hand lever
-
0.052% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.052% fail on Lever
- 0.052% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
6.5% fail on
Brake performance
(40% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(77% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.21% fail on Joints
-
4.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.62% fail on
Doors
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Other passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.26% fail on Door condition
-
0.052% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.052% fail on Door condition
-
0.36% fail on
Other passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.16% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.052% fail on Tank
- 0.21% fail on Bumpers
-
0.21% fail on
Body
- 0.10% fail on Other body component
- 0.052% fail on Mounting fixings
- 0.052% fail on Panel
-
0.10% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.10% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.052% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.052% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.052% fail on
Seats
- 0.052% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.052% fail on Undertray
-
4.9% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Tyres
(25% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Tread depth
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 0.10% fail on Size/type
-
5.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(35% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(39% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.052% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
1.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(37% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.67% fail on Catalyst emissions (50% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
5.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(39% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Visibility
- 2.8% fail on Washers
- 2.3% fail on Wipers
-
0.16% fail on
View to rear
- 0.16% fail on Mirrors
- 0.052% fail on Bonnet
-
0.052% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.052% fail on Windscreen
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.99% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.36% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.36% fail on Condition
-
0.41% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.41% fail on Registration plates
-
0.36% fail on
Steering
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Steering linkage components
(86% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.26% fail on
Steering linkage components
(86% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
- 0.052% fail on Condition
-
0.052% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.052% fail on
Doors
- 0.052% fail on Emergency exits
-
0.052% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Altea (2004 - 2015)
Roomy cabin with a decent boot. Distinctive styling. Excellent crash test rating.