SEAT Alhambra MOT Results
Registered in 201784.8% pass rate
from 5,973 tests in 2021
(19% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Alhambra is unusually good or bad.
-
5.6% fail on
Tyres
(64% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.067% fail on Size/type
-
3.2% fail on
Visibility
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.55% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.067% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.067% fail on Windscreen
-
0.050% fail on
View to rear
- 0.050% fail on Mirrors
- 0.017% fail on Driver's view
-
3.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.033% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.75% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.75% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.35% fail on Headlamp
- 0.18% fail on Headlamp levelling device (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Dipswitch
- 0.017% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.22% fail on
Electrical equipment
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.017% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.017% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Stop lamp (70% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.033% fail on
Hazard warning
(10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.017% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.017% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.017% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.9% fail on
Suspension
(120% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Ball joint
- 0.017% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.084% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.067% fail on
Springs
(80% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.067% fail on
Coil springs
(80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Coil spring (80% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.067% fail on
Coil springs
(80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.050% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.017% fail on Linkage
- 0.017% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.050% fail on
Other suspension component
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.017% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Brakes
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads
- 0.033% fail on Brake linings
-
0.22% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.22% fail on Brake discs
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.55% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.35% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.33% fail on
Rbt
- 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.033% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.017% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.017% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.33% fail on
Rbt
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.067% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.050% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.050% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.050% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.033% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.050% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.033% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.033% fail on
Rbt
- 0.033% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.033% fail on
Rbt
-
0.35% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Electronic parking brake (17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.067% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.033% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.033% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.033% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.033% fail on Pedal
-
0.017% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.017% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.017% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.52% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.50% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.30% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.033% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.20% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.30% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.033% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.033% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.50% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.44% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(84% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.15% fail on Condition
- 0.050% fail on Requirements (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.42% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.15% fail on
Transmission
-
0.15% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.15% fail on Joints
-
0.15% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.10% fail on
Seats
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Driver's seat (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.067% fail on
Doors
-
0.067% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.067% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.033% fail on
Body
- 0.033% fail on Other body component
-
0.017% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.017% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.017% fail on Undertray
-
0.15% fail on
Transmission
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
- 0.017% fail on Condition
-
0.15% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.15% fail on Registration plates
-
0.084% fail on
Steering
-
0.033% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.033% fail on Steering rack
-
0.033% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.033% fail on Track rod end
-
0.017% fail on
Power steering
- 0.017% fail on Operation
-
0.033% fail on
Steering gear
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Alhambra (2010 - 2020)
Proper seven-seat practicality which is more than you can say for most SUVs, practical and spacious even with all seven seats occupied, sliding rear doors are a real boon especially the electric versions.