SEAT Alhambra MOT Results
Registered in 201578.3% pass rate
from 2,309 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Alhambra is unusually good or bad.
-
8.3% fail on
Tyres
(92% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
-
5.6% fail on
Suspension
(74% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.043% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.35% fail on
Springs
(79% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Coil springs
(79% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Coil spring (79% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Coil springs
(79% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.17% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.043% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.087% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.043% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.043% fail on Ball joint
-
4.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.74% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.74% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.56% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.17% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.74% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.48% fail on
Headlamps
(55% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.35% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.30% fail on Stop lamp (66% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.13% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.087% fail on Trailer electrical socket (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Horn
-
0.087% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.087% fail on Position lamp
-
0.087% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.087% fail on Reversing lamps
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
3.0% fail on
Visibility
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
- 0.74% fail on Washers (47% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.087% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.087% fail on Windscreen
-
0.087% fail on
View to rear
- 0.087% fail on Mirrors
- 0.043% fail on Bonnet
-
2.4% fail on
Brakes
(32% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(36% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.043% fail on Brake linings
-
0.35% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.35% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.65% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.43% fail on
Rbt
- 0.35% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.43% fail on
Rbt
-
0.13% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.087% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.043% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.043% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.52% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Electronic parking brake (34 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(36% better than other 2015 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(96% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(97% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.087% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.043% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.56% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.56% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
2.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(97% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.35% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.087% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.087% fail on Condition
-
0.26% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.26% fail on Registration plates
-
0.26% fail on
Steering
-
0.13% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.087% fail on Track rod end
- 0.043% fail on Locking devices
- 0.087% fail on Electronic power steering (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.043% fail on Steering rack
-
0.13% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.26% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Transmission
-
0.13% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.13% fail on Joints
-
0.13% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.087% fail on
Doors
-
0.087% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.087% fail on Door condition
-
0.087% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.043% fail on
Body
- 0.043% fail on Panel
-
0.13% fail on
Transmission
-
0.17% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Alhambra (2010 - 2020)
Proper seven-seat practicality which is more than you can say for most SUVs, practical and spacious even with all seven seats occupied, sliding rear doors are a real boon especially the electric versions.