SEAT Alhambra MOT Results
Registered in 201280.0% pass rate
from 1,413 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Alhambra is unusually good or bad.
-
9.1% fail on
Tyres
(63% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 1.4% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Size/type
-
6.0% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(26% better than other 2012 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.85% fail on Front lamps
- 0.35% fail on Rear lamps
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Individual lamps
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.78% fail on Registration plate lamp (58% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.50% fail on
Headlamps
(64% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Horn
- 0.071% fail on Battery
-
0.071% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.071% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.071% fail on Rear reflectors
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.071% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.071% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.071% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.21% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.14% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.14% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.071% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.071% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.14% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.14% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.14% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
0.071% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.071% fail on Front
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.35% fail on Windscreen
- 0.35% fail on Washers (73% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Brakes
(41% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Hub components
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.28% fail on Brake discs
-
0.35% fail on
Brake performance
(68% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.071% fail on Front wheels
- 0.071% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.14% fail on ABS
- 0.071% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.071% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.071% fail on Leaks
-
1.7% fail on
Hub components
-
0.35% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.35% fail on Attachment
-
0.35% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.21% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.21% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.28% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.28% fail on Registration plate
-
0.14% fail on
Steering
-
0.14% fail on
Steering system
- 0.14% fail on Track rod end
-
0.14% fail on
Steering system
-
0.14% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 0.071% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.071% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.071% fail on System
-
0.071% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.071% fail on Body condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Alhambra (2010 - 2020)
Proper seven-seat practicality which is more than you can say for most SUVs, practical and spacious even with all seven seats occupied, sliding rear doors are a real boon especially the electric versions.