SEAT Alhambra MOT Results

Registered in 2012
80.0% pass rate
from 1,413 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Alhambra is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.1% fail on Tyres (63% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Size/type
  • 6.0% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (26% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.85% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.35% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.071% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plate lamp (58% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.50% fail on Headlamps (64% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Horn
    • 0.071% fail on Battery
    • 0.071% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.071% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.071% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 4.1% fail on Suspension
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.071% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.071% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.071% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.21% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.14% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.14% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.071% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.071% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.14% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.071% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.071% fail on Front
  • 3.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.35% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.35% fail on Washers (73% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
  • 2.3% fail on Brakes (41% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.28% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.35% fail on Brake performance (68% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.071% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.071% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.14% fail on ABS
    • 0.071% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.071% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.071% fail on Leaks
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment
  • 0.35% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.21% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.21% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
  • 0.28% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.14% fail on Steering
    • 0.14% fail on Steering system
      • 0.14% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.071% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.071% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.071% fail on System
  • 0.071% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.071% fail on Body condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • SEAT Alhambra (2010 - 2020)
    Proper seven-seat practicality which is more than you can say for most SUVs, practical and spacious even with all seven seats occupied, sliding rear doors are a real boon especially the electric versions.

    Search Good Garages