SEAT Alhambra MOT Results
Registered in 200545.2% pass rate
from 739 tests in 2021
(21% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Alhambra is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Suspension
(59% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(96% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint
- 0.54% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.27% fail on Linkage
- 9.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.14% fail on Suspension arm
-
5.7% fail on
Springs
-
5.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 5.7% fail on Coil spring
-
5.7% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.2% fail on
Sub-frames
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.6% fail on
Other suspension component
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
1.5% fail on
Macpherson strut
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.27% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(96% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
20% fail on
Brakes
(53% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(52% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Decelerometer
(10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (17 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.14% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
-
1.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
0.68% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.68% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Linkage
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.54% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.27% fail on Lever
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.14% fail on Pedal
-
0.14% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.14% fail on Servos
-
0.14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(52% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
20% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(140% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Transmission
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Joints (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.14% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.54% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.54% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.4% fail on
Chassis
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Strengthening plate
-
1.4% fail on
Doors
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Other passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.41% fail on Door condition
-
0.14% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.14% fail on Door condition
-
0.81% fail on
Other passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.41% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.27% fail on Pipe
- 0.14% fail on Tank
-
0.14% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.14% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.14% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.14% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.14% fail on
Seats
- 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.14% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.14% fail on Boot lid condition
-
9.1% fail on
Transmission
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.95% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.81% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.54% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.95% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.68% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.14% fail on Horn
- 0.68% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (70% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.41% fail on Position lamp
-
0.41% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.41% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.41% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.14% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.14% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
6.9% fail on
Visibility
- 4.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers (52% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.54% fail on Windscreen
- 0.41% fail on Bonnet
-
0.14% fail on
View to rear
- 0.14% fail on Mirrors
-
6.0% fail on
Steering
(51% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Steering arm
-
0.54% fail on
Power steering
- 0.27% fail on Operation
- 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.14% fail on Rams
- 0.14% fail on Other components
-
0.54% fail on
Steering play
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 0.27% fail on Size/type
-
4.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(65% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Requirements
- 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(62% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(64% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.68% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.27% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.95% fail on
Spark ignition
(81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Catalyst emissions (88% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.27% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(64% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.4% fail on Registration plates
-
0.41% fail on
Seat belt installation check
(39 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Belt(s)/padding (74 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
- 0.14% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Alhambra (1996 - 2010)
True seven-seater with more cheerful trim than its VW Sharan and Ford Galaxy equivalents. Good car-like drive.