SEAT Alhambra MOT Results
Registered in 200346.3% pass rate
from 637 tests in 2021
(20% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the SEAT Alhambra is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Suspension
(71% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(95% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.78% fail on Ball joint
- 0.31% fail on Linkage
- 0.31% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
8.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(44% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.5% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
4.7% fail on
Springs
-
4.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.7% fail on Coil spring
-
4.7% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.5% fail on
Sub-frames
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Macpherson strut
(6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
-
1.3% fail on
Other suspension component
(180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.16% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint
-
21% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Transmission
(190% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.31% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.31% fail on Joints
-
9.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.4% fail on
Chassis
(7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Chassis condition (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
Doors
-
0.78% fail on
Front passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.31% fail on Door condition
-
0.16% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.16% fail on Door condition
-
0.78% fail on
Front passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Seats
- 0.31% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.16% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.16% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.16% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.16% fail on
Cabs
- 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas
-
9.6% fail on
Transmission
(190% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.8% fail on
Headlamps
(49% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp levelling device (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.94% fail on
Position lamps
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Position lamp (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.31% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
-
7.8% fail on
Headlamps
(49% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(30% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(43% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.31% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Plate brake tester
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.16% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.16% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
-
1.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.47% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (56% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
0.78% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.63% fail on Brake pads
- 0.16% fail on Brake linings
-
0.47% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.16% fail on Cable
- 0.16% fail on Lever
- 0.16% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.3% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.63% fail on Lever
-
0.47% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Leaks (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Servos
-
0.47% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.47% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.16% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.16% fail on Hand lever
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(43% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Steering
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Steering gear
(8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Drag link end
-
0.63% fail on
Power steering
- 0.47% fail on Operation
- 0.16% fail on Other components
-
0.16% fail on
Steering play
- 0.16% fail on Steering rack
-
7.5% fail on
Steering gear
(8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Tyres
- 4.4% fail on Condition (68% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
-
5.7% fail on
Visibility
- 2.5% fail on Washers
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
-
0.94% fail on
View to rear
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Bonnet
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(62% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Requirements
- 0.63% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(40% better than other 2003 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(41% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(70% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (57% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Catalyst emissions (85% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.16% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
2.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.16% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.16% fail on Other leaks
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(41% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.4% fail on Registration plates
-
0.63% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.63% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
SEAT Alhambra (1996 - 2010)
True seven-seater with more cheerful trim than its VW Sharan and Ford Galaxy equivalents. Good car-like drive.