SAAB 900 MOT Results
Registered in 199259.5% pass rate
from 390 tests in 2021
(23% worse than other 1992 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the SAAB 900 is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(55% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(140% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt
- 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.26% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
- 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.26% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
-
0.77% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(78% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(77% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.77% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(77% better than other 1992 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(140% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.51% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.51% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.26% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.26% fail on Brake pads
-
0.26% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.26% fail on Brake discs
-
0.26% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.51% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.51% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.26% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.26% fail on Lever
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(55% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.1% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.51% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.51% fail on Horn
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp
-
0.77% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.77% fail on Switch
- 0.77% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
4.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
12% fail on
Suspension
- 8.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (100% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.77% fail on Ball joint
-
0.51% fail on
Springs
-
0.51% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.51% fail on Coil spring
-
0.51% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.26% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.26% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.26% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.26% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.8% fail on
Transmission
-
3.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.77% fail on
Chassis
- 0.77% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.77% fail on
Seats
- 0.51% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.26% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.51% fail on Floor
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.26% fail on Bumpers
-
0.26% fail on
Towbar
- 0.26% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.26% fail on
Doors
-
0.26% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.26% fail on Door condition
-
0.26% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.26% fail on
Cabs
- 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas
-
9.7% fail on
Visibility
- 5.9% fail on Washers
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
- 0.51% fail on Bonnet
-
6.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.0% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.77% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.77% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.51% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.26% fail on Other leaks
-
5.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.9% fail on
Steering
-
3.8% fail on
Steering gear
(170% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.1% fail on Track rod end
-
0.51% fail on
Power steering
- 0.26% fail on Operation
- 0.26% fail on Other components
- 0.26% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.26% fail on Steering column
-
0.26% fail on
Steering play
- 0.26% fail on Steering rack
-
3.8% fail on
Steering gear
(170% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.0% fail on Registration plates
-
0.26% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.26% fail on Belt(s)/padding