SAAB 9-5 MOT Results
Registered in 200459.2% pass rate
from 1,376 tests in 2021
(13% better than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the SAAB 9-5 is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
8.0% fail on
Headlamps
(48% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Headlamp (51% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.073% fail on Dipswitch
- 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
(38% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.87% fail on Stop lamp (80% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(12 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Main beam tell-tale (31 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.073% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.073% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.073% fail on Horn
-
0.073% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.073% fail on Position lamp
-
8.0% fail on
Headlamps
(48% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
14% fail on
Suspension
(19% better than other 2004 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.58% fail on Ball joint
- 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.36% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.073% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
3.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(36% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint (50% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Suspension arm
- 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.2% fail on
Sub-frames
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (24 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.22% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Springs
(54% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
(54% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Coil spring (57% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Mounting
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
(54% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.073% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.073% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings (70% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.29% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.073% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.073% fail on
Axles
- 0.073% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
0.073% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.073% fail on Pins and bushes
-
5.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(18% better than other 2004 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
(29% better than other 2004 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.073% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
(54% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
(55% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.073% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.073% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
(55% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance (82% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
0.65% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(180% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Cable
- 0.29% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
0.58% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.58% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.22% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.58% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.58% fail on Hand lever
-
0.58% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.58% fail on Lever
-
0.44% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.36% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.073% fail on Servos
- 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.15% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.073% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.073% fail on Other components
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
(29% better than other 2004 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (77% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (56% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.65% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.073% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
7.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.58% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.36% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.15% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.073% fail on Other leaks
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Tyres
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 2.9% fail on Condition
-
5.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(43% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.2% fail on
Transmission
(66% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(64% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Joints (64% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(64% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.29% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.22% fail on Tank
- 0.073% fail on Pipe
-
0.44% fail on
Chassis
- 0.44% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.29% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.29% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.22% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.22% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.15% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.15% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.073% fail on Bumpers
-
0.073% fail on
Towbar
- 0.073% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.073% fail on
Doors
-
0.073% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.073% fail on Door condition
-
0.073% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.073% fail on
Seats
- 0.073% fail on Passenger's seat
-
4.1% fail on
Visibility
(48% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Wipers (39% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Washers (58% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.29% fail on Windscreen
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.7% fail on
Seat belts
(68% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.44% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (72% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Seat belts
(68% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Steering
(34% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(42% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.073% fail on Ball joint
-
0.73% fail on
Power steering
- 0.36% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Operation
- 0.22% fail on Other components
-
0.36% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.36% fail on Steering rack
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(42% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.73% fail on Registration plates
-
0.73% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.58% fail on Attachment
- 0.15% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Saab 9-5 (1997 - 2009)
Decent mix of performance and economy. Superb long-distance comfort aided by good ride and fantastic seats. An exceptionally safe car.