SAAB 9-3 MOT Results
Registered in 200356.7% pass rate
from 1,764 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the SAAB 9-3 is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
5.8% fail on
Springs
(48% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Coil springs
(48% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Coil spring (49% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Mounting
- 0.11% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
5.7% fail on
Coil springs
(48% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover (64% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.85% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.62% fail on Ball joint
- 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.23% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Linkage
- 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.79% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.68% fail on Sub-frame (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.057% fail on Ball joint
-
0.51% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.057% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.23% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.057% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.17% fail on
Axles
- 0.11% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.057% fail on Axle
- 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings (88% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.057% fail on Suspension rod
-
5.8% fail on
Springs
(48% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.5% fail on
Headlamps
(43% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Headlamp (43% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Dipswitch (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
3.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (52% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.057% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(31% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (66% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.91% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.91% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.91% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.85% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.40% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Horn
-
0.57% fail on
Position lamps
(150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Position lamp (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.11% fail on Main beam tell-tale (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Rear reflectors
-
7.5% fail on
Headlamps
(43% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brakes
(16% better than other 2003 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.057% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.057% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
-
3.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.057% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.057% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
-
0.96% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(38% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(66% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads (68% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.74% fail on Brake discs
- 0.057% fail on Brake drums
-
0.28% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.23% fail on Cable
- 0.057% fail on Lever
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(66% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (73% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Brake fluid (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.57% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.45% fail on Hand lever
- 0.11% fail on Pedal
-
0.57% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.57% fail on Lever
- 0.57% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.57% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(59% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Anti-lock braking system (66% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.23% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.057% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.057% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.057% fail on Operation
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 2.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.057% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.057% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.057% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.51% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
6.2% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.1% fail on
Fluid leaks
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.057% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.057% fail on Other leaks
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(24% better than other 2003 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.96% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.57% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.17% fail on Tank
- 0.17% fail on Pipe
- 0.057% fail on Hose
-
0.51% fail on
Transmission
(85% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Drive shafts
(86% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Joints (85% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.057% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.057% fail on Joints
-
0.45% fail on
Drive shafts
(86% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Chassis
- 0.34% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.34% fail on Bumpers
-
0.34% fail on
Doors
-
0.17% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.17% fail on Door condition
-
0.11% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
-
0.057% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.057% fail on Door condition
-
0.17% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.34% fail on
Seats
- 0.34% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.23% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(75% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (80% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.057% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.057% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.17% fail on
Body
- 0.11% fail on Mounting fixings (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Panel
- 0.11% fail on Undertray
-
0.057% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.057% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.057% fail on
Towbar
- 0.057% fail on Other towbar components
-
6.6% fail on
Visibility
- 3.7% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers
-
0.17% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.17% fail on Windscreen
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet
-
0.11% fail on
View to rear
- 0.11% fail on Mirrors
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.17% fail on Size/type
-
4.5% fail on
Steering
-
3.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Locking devices
- 0.057% fail on Drag link end
-
0.68% fail on
Power steering
- 0.34% fail on Other components
- 0.23% fail on Operation
- 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.34% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.28% fail on Steering rack
- 0.057% fail on Operation
- 0.057% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.057% fail on Steering column
- 0.057% fail on Electronic power steering
-
3.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.91% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.91% fail on Registration plates
-
0.68% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.62% fail on Attachment
- 0.057% fail on Hubs
Read the Honest John Review
-
Saab 9-3 Convertible (2003 - 2011)
Vastly better to drive than the previous version. Superb seats. Excellent crash test rating. A lot of convertible for your money.