SAAB 9-3 MOT Results
Registered in 200057.8% pass rate
from 1,108 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the SAAB 9-3 is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (91% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.8% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.45% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.99% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.090% fail on Horn
-
0.72% fail on
Hazard warning
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Main beam tell-tale (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (66% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(67% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(67% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(67% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.18% fail on Position lamp
-
4.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
9.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(51% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
3.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
- 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.090% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.090% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.36% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
-
1.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.99% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.72% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(51% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
-
0.54% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.54% fail on Brake discs
-
0.45% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.36% fail on Cable
- 0.090% fail on Lever
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.63% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.54% fail on Hand lever
- 0.090% fail on Pedal
-
0.45% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.45% fail on Lever
-
0.36% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.36% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.27% fail on Other braking system component (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.36% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.27% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.18% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.090% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.090% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.18% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.090% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.090% fail on Servos
-
9.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Suspension
- 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint
- 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.090% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.3% fail on
Springs
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.4% fail on Coil spring
- 0.18% fail on Mounting
- 0.63% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(61% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.27% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.090% fail on Linkage
-
0.81% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Macpherson strut (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.63% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.54% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.090% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.27% fail on
Axles
- 0.27% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.18% fail on Wheel bearings (86% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.090% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.090% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
9.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 5.3% fail on Exhaust system (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Tank
- 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.18% fail on Hose
-
1.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.81% fail on
Transmission
(73% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Joints (71% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Chassis
- 0.72% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.45% fail on
Body
- 0.27% fail on Other body component
- 0.18% fail on Panel
- 0.27% fail on Floor
-
0.27% fail on
Seats
- 0.27% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.18% fail on Bumpers
-
0.090% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.090% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.090% fail on
Doors
-
0.090% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.090% fail on Door condition
-
0.090% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.090% fail on Undertray
-
6.7% fail on
Visibility
- 4.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.3% fail on Washers
- 0.090% fail on Bonnet
-
0.090% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.090% fail on Windscreen
-
0.090% fail on
View to rear
- 0.090% fail on Mirrors
-
5.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(31% better than other 2000 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(35% better than other 2000 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(33% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (50% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.18% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.18% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.090% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.090% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.090% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(33% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.72% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.090% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
5.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(35% better than other 2000 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts
(55% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Condition
- 0.090% fail on Requirements
- 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.090% fail on
Airbags
- 0.090% fail on Drivers airbag
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts
(55% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth (49% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Size/type
-
2.5% fail on
Steering
-
0.90% fail on
Steering linkage components
(62% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Track rod end (53% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Power steering
- 0.54% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.36% fail on Steering rack
- 0.090% fail on Steering column
- 0.090% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.90% fail on
Steering linkage components
(62% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.72% fail on Registration plates
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Attachment