MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Rover » Streetwise » 2005

Rover Streetwise MOT Results

Registered in 2005
57.4% pass rate
from 256 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover Streetwise is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.9% fail on Electrical equipment (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Battery(ies) (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.39% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.78% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.78% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.78% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.78% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (30 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.39% fail on Switch
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 11% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 11% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.39% fail on Joints
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.78% fail on System (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Tank
    • 0.39% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.39% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.39% fail on Body
      • 0.39% fail on Panel
    • 0.39% fail on Doors
      • 0.39% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.39% fail on Door condition
  • 8.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 3.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.39% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.78% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.39% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.39% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.39% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.39% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.39% fail on Undertray
    • 0.39% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.39% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on View to rear
      • 0.78% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.39% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.78% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.78% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.39% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.0% fail on Brakes (48% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.39% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.39% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.39% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.39% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.39% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.39% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.39% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.39% fail on Leaks
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.39% fail on Lever
    • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.39% fail on Brake fluid
  • 6.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 0.78% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Operation
    • 0.78% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.78% fail on Steering rack
  • 6.3% fail on Suspension (64% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.78% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.78% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.78% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.78% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.39% fail on Axles
      • 0.39% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.39% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.78% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.78% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages