Rover Streetwise MOT Results
Registered in 200554.2% pass rate
from 349 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover Streetwise is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.29% fail on Matched pair
-
4.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.9% fail on Front lamps
- 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.4% fail on Battery (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.86% fail on Switch (37 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Tell tale
-
0.86% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.86% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.29% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.86% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.86% fail on Horn
-
0.29% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.29% fail on Lamp
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 12% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Drive shafts (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.57% fail on Component mounting
- 0.57% fail on Spring mounting (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Subframe mounting
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (72% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
0.29% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
-
0.29% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.29% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.29% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
-
0.29% fail on
Axles
- 0.29% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
0.29% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.29% fail on Front
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Tyres
- 6.3% fail on Tread depth
- 3.7% fail on Condition
- 0.86% fail on Size/type
- 0.29% fail on Valve stem
-
9.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(82% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Emissions (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.57% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.29% fail on Tank
- 0.29% fail on Pipe
-
9.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.4% fail on Washers
- 0.57% fail on Windscreen
- 0.29% fail on Bonnet
- 0.29% fail on Mirrors
-
7.7% fail on
Brakes
(42% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.6% fail on Front wheels
- 0.57% fail on Rear wheels (83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.7% fail on Condition
-
1.7% fail on
Hub components
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
-
1.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(70% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Components
(76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Pipes
- 0.29% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
0.86% fail on
Components
(76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on ABS
-
4.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.9% fail on
Steering
(71% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Steering system
(84% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Steering rack
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint
-
0.57% fail on
Power steering
- 0.57% fail on Other components
-
6.6% fail on
Steering system
(84% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.1% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.57% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.29% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.1% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
1.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.57% fail on
Doors
- 0.57% fail on Passengers front
- 0.29% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.29% fail on
Seats
- 0.29% fail on Drivers
-
0.57% fail on
Doors
-
0.57% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.57% fail on Attachment
-
0.29% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.29% fail on Registration plate