Rover Metro MOT Results

Registered in 1994
58.0% pass rate
from 317 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover Metro is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 17% fail on Exhaust emissions (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 17% fail on Spark ignition (170% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 11% fail on Catalyst emissions (130% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Non catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.32% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.32% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.32% fail on Other leaks
  • 17% fail on Brakes (44% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 8.5% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 6.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.95% fail on Pedal
      • 0.32% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.63% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.32% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.32% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.32% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.32% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 6.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (29 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Operation (111 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.95% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.32% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Switch
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.32% fail on Horn
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.63% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.63% fail on Switch
    • 0.32% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.32% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.32% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.32% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.95% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on System
    • 0.95% fail on Chassis
      • 0.95% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.32% fail on Towbar
      • 0.32% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.32% fail on Body
      • 0.32% fail on Panel
    • 0.32% fail on Doors
      • 0.32% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.32% fail on Door condition
    • 0.32% fail on Seats
      • 0.32% fail on Driver's seat
  • 4.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.95% fail on Washers (73% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.32% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
  • 0.63% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.32% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.32% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages