Rover Metro MOT Results

Registered in 1992
57.2% pass rate
from 159 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover Metro is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (86% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 14% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on System
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 6.3% fail on Subframe mounting (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on General condition (24 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid suspension (16 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Operation
      • 0.63% fail on Bellows
    • 1.3% fail on Radius arms (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (13 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
      • 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.63% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.63% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.63% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.63% fail on Rear
    • 0.63% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.8% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Front wheels (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.63% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.1% fail on Components
        • 1.9% fail on Pipes
        • 0.63% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.63% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.63% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.63% fail on Pedal
        • 0.63% fail on Anti-slip
  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.4% fail on Battery
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.3% fail on Tell tales (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.63% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.63% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.63% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.63% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.63% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.63% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.63% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.63% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.63% fail on Lamp
  • 9.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
  • 6.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
  • 4.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis
    • 1.9% fail on Body condition
    • 0.63% fail on Doors
      • 0.63% fail on Passengers front

Search Good Garages