Rover Metro MOT Results
Registered in 199268.0% pass rate
from 125 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover Metro is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(140% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
15% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(160% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
15% fail on
Spark ignition
(190% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Non catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
-
15% fail on
Spark ignition
(190% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
15% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(160% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.80% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.80% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.80% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.80% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.80% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.80% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension
- 4.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.6% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.80% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.80% fail on Ball joint
-
0.80% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.80% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.80% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.80% fail on Levelling valve
-
5.6% fail on
Brakes
-
5.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.80% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
-
2.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.80% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.80% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
- 0.80% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.80% fail on Hand lever
-
5.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.6% fail on
Visibility
- 4.0% fail on Washers
- 1.6% fail on Wipers
-
4.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.6% fail on
Body
- 1.6% fail on Other body component (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Cabs
(8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Chassis
- 0.80% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.80% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.80% fail on Pipe
-
1.6% fail on
Steering
-
1.6% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.6% fail on Steering rack
-
1.6% fail on
Steering gear
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.6% fail on
Tyres
- 0.80% fail on Condition
- 0.80% fail on Tread depth
-
0.80% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.80% fail on Registration plates