MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Rover » 75 » 2005

Rover 75 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
56.8% pass rate
from 1,735 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 75 is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (34% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (92% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint (90% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Pins and bushes (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Suspension arm (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 9.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (74% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (81% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Ball joint (98% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Linkage
      • 0.058% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 3.9% fail on Springs
      • 3.8% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.8% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.058% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.058% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.058% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.058% fail on Axles
      • 0.058% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.058% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.058% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.058% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.058% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (92% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp (51% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Horn
      • 0.058% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.23% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.058% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.058% fail on Switch
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (46% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.058% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.058% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 0.98% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.75% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.35% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (35% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.92% fail on Brake linings and pads (56% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Brake pads (56% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.75% fail on Hand lever (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
    • 0.63% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.058% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.35% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.058% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.058% fail on Brake fluid
  • 7.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Doors
      • 0.46% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.35% fail on Door condition
      • 0.058% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.058% fail on Door condition
    • 0.69% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.69% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.63% fail on Transmission (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Drive shafts (85% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Joints (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.12% fail on Joints
    • 0.58% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.46% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Hose
      • 0.058% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.58% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.29% fail on Chassis
      • 0.29% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.29% fail on Engine mounting (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Engine mounting condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Bracket
    • 0.23% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
      • 0.058% fail on Body condition
      • 0.058% fail on Panel
    • 0.17% fail on Undertray
    • 0.058% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.058% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.058% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 6.9% fail on Visibility
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.40% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.058% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.058% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.6% fail on Steering (67% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Steering linkage components (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Track rod end (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.058% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.058% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.81% fail on Power steering (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Other components
      • 0.17% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.17% fail on Rams (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
      • 0.058% fail on Pump
    • 0.40% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.058% fail on Operation
    • 0.12% fail on Steering column (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.058% fail on Steering play
      • 0.058% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 4.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (61% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.69% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
      • 0.058% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Airbags
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (41% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (43% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (61% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Emissions not tested (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.058% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.058% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition (73% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.52% fail on Catalyst emissions (77% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (87% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.23% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.058% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.17% fail on Noise suppression (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Undertray (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages