Rover 75 MOT Results
Registered in 200351.7% pass rate
from 6,686 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 75 is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Suspension
(18% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (98% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(60% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (84% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.19% fail on Linkage condition (59% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Attachment
- 0.030% fail on Condition
- 0.015% fail on Presence
-
4.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.8% fail on Condition
- 0.090% fail on Location
-
2.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.1% fail on Component mounting (27% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Subframe mounting (56% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Spring mounting
- 2.1% fail on Front suspension joints (38% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.5% fail on Condition
-
0.64% fail on
Drive shafts
(84% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Front drive shafts
(83% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Constant velocity joints (84% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Couplings
-
0.64% fail on
Front drive shafts
(83% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Wheel bearings
(80% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Front (71% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Rear (87% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.28% fail on Condition
-
0.22% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.030% fail on Attachment
- 0.015% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.12% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.060% fail on Attachment
- 0.045% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.075% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.045% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.015% fail on Attachment
-
0.060% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.045% fail on Condition
- 0.015% fail on Attachment
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
23% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(12% better than other 2003 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Headlamp aim (12% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (18% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(58% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
(58% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Individual lamps (79% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.63% fail on All direction indicators (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Switch
- 0.030% fail on Tell tales
-
0.015% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.015% fail on Switch
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
(58% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamps
(20% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp (19% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.045% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.030% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.030% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.030% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.7% fail on Stop lamp (53% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Position lamps
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Front lamps (80% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps (42% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.030% fail on All position lamps
-
0.94% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(38% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Fog lamp (49% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Battery (50% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Horn (61% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.075% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.060% fail on
Hazard warning
(71% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Switch
- 0.015% fail on Tell tale
- 0.015% fail on Rear reflectors
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(13% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Brake performance
(12% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Parking brake performance (54% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.3% fail on Front wheels (45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested (85% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Brake operation
-
8.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(32% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Components
(36% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Pipes (74% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Hoses (56% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.51% fail on Leaks
- 0.045% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.015% fail on Operation
-
8.0% fail on
Components
(36% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake
(190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Hub components
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads (45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Brake discs
- 0.27% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.015% fail on Brake back plates
- 1.0% fail on ABS
-
0.15% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.15% fail on
Pedal
- 0.15% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.15% fail on
Pedal
- 0.075% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.075% fail on Restricted movement (74% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Additional braking devices (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.030% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
0.015% fail on
Components
- 0.015% fail on Pipes
- 0.045% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.030% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.030% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Brake performance
(12% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Tyres
(12% better than other 2003 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Tread depth
- 3.1% fail on Condition (19% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Size/type
- 0.030% fail on Valve stem
-
7.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(18% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Wipers (23% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Washers (26% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Windscreen
- 0.49% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Mirrors
-
6.9% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.0% fail on Emissions (40% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
(73% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.45% fail on System (83% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Cap
- 0.13% fail on Pipe
- 0.045% fail on Hose
- 0.48% fail on Emissions not tested (38% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(68% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Drivers airbag (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Passengers airbag
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(30% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Condition
- 0.55% fail on Prescribed areas (54% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Requirements
- 0.030% fail on Attachment
-
0.015% fail on
Installation check
- 0.015% fail on Anchorage's
-
4.4% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(190% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Steering
-
4.3% fail on
Steering system
- 3.5% fail on Track rod end
- 0.45% fail on Steering rack (46% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint
-
0.030% fail on
Free play
- 0.030% fail on Steering rack
- 0.030% fail on Steering arm
-
0.43% fail on
Power steering
- 0.31% fail on Other components (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.030% fail on Operation (79% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Pump
- 0.015% fail on Drive system
- 0.015% fail on Rams
-
0.25% fail on
Steering control
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Steering column (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Steering operation
- 0.015% fail on Locking devices
- 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
-
4.3% fail on
Steering system
-
2.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.73% fail on Body condition
-
0.49% fail on
Seats
(94% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Drivers
-
0.27% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.27% fail on Chassis
- 0.24% fail on Engine mountings (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Doors
(60% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Passengers other (65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Drivers
- 0.060% fail on Passengers front
-
0.030% fail on
Load security
- 0.030% fail on Access panel
- 0.015% fail on Body security
-
0.88% fail on
Road Wheels
(86% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Attachment (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Condition
-
0.58% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(48% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Registration plate (48% better than other 2003 cars)