Rover 75 MOT Results

Registered in 2000

56.2% pass rate

from 797 tests in 2020

(0.36% worse than other 2000 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 75 is unusually good or bad.

24% fail on Suspension (52% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.8% fail on Suspension arms (83% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 3.6% fail on Ball joint (67% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes (59% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 2.6% fail on Suspension arm (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover (28% better than other 2000 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.88% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.13% fail on Linkage
  - 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 8.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (90% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Springs (45% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 3.4% fail on Coil springs (54% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 3.1% fail on Coil spring (47% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.25% fail on Mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers (85% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Other suspension component (72% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on Ball joint (47% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.75% fail on Wheel bearings (49% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Axles
  - 0.13% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.13% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.13% fail on Sub-frame
15% fail on Brakes (6.3% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Brake performance (9.3% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 4.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (36% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (43% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (32% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 2.0% fail on Rbt (34% better than other 2000 cars)
      - 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (36% better than other 2000 cars)
      - 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance (29% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2.7% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 1.3% fail on Rbt (3.1% better than other 2000 cars)
      - 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (1.9% better than other 2000 cars)
      - 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    - 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 1.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (57% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (56% better than other 2000 cars)
      - 0.88% fail on Service brake imbalance (45% better than other 2000 cars)
      - 0.50% fail on Service brake performance (48% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested (3.5% better than other 2000 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (90% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 3.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control
- 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (39% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (21% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 1.4% fail on Brake pads (20% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.63% fail on Brake discs and drums (37% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.63% fail on Brake discs (36% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Parking brake control (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.0% fail on Lever (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (86% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.75% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Pedal
- 0.13% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.13% fail on Servos
- 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (17% better than other 2000 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Headlamps (20% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 5.0% fail on Headlamp (27% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.5% fail on Direction indicators (48% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 3.5% fail on Flashing type (49% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (81% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 1.0% fail on Side repeaters (25% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (26% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (57% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.50% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (53% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Electrical equipment (48% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Horn (47% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Position lamps (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on Position lamp (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (73% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 2000 cars)
6.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (34% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (62% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (66% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Exhaust system (49% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Chassis (5.7% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.0% fail on Chassis condition (4.6% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Doors (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.75% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.75% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Front passenger's door (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.25% fail on Door condition (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Fuel system (21% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Tank (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Pipe (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.25% fail on Bumpers (30% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.13% fail on Body
  - 0.13% fail on Other body component
- 0.13% fail on Seats
  - 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat
6.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Seat belts (33% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (26% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2000 cars)
6.0% fail on Visibility (23% better than other 2000 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Wipers (33% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Washers (28% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.38% fail on View to rear (24% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on Mirrors (27% worse than other 2000 cars)
4.6% fail on Tyres (16% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Condition (5.2% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth (31% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Size/type (6.5% worse than other 2000 cars)
3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (65% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (66% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 2.5% fail on Spark ignition (67% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (72% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.50% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (69% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested (59% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Compression ignition (62% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    - 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.25% fail on Fluid leaks (57% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Engine oil leaks (42% better than other 2000 cars)
1.9% fail on Steering (51% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components (48% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Track rod end (37% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Steering gear (64% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on Steering rack (63% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Power steering
  - 0.13% fail on Other components
- 0.13% fail on Steering wheel
0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle (45% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Registration plates (45% better than other 2000 cars)
0.38% fail on Road Wheels (14% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Attachment (0.25% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Condition