MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Rover » 75 » 2000

Rover 75 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
49.3% pass rate
from 1,742 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 75 is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Suspension (38% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Condition (19 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment
    • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.5% fail on Component mounting (37% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.29% fail on Spring mounting
    • 5.1% fail on Coil springs (63% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Condition (66% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Location
    • 3.3% fail on Front suspension joints (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.75% fail on Wheel bearings (61% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Rear (57% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Front (69% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Drive shafts (92% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Front drive shafts (92% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Constant velocity joints (92% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.23% fail on Condition (26 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.23% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.057% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (59% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Headlamp aim (24% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.1% fail on Direction indicators (84% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Flashing type (84% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Individual lamps (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.80% fail on All direction indicators (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Tell tales (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Switch
      • 0.057% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.057% fail on Switch
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp (47% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps (55% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front lamps (63% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.57% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Fog lamp (69% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.23% fail on Horn
    • 0.17% fail on Battery (84% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.057% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.057% fail on Tell tale
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 10.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.2% fail on Parking brake performance (68% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Front wheels (59% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Service brake performance (55% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Brake operation
    • 7.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.8% fail on Components
        • 6.3% fail on Pipes (51% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Hoses (51% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.34% fail on Leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.9% fail on ABS (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Parking brake (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components (40% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.34% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.057% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.057% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.057% fail on Pedal
        • 0.057% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.057% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.057% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.057% fail on Leaks
    • 0.057% fail on Locking devices
  • 8.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.92% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (69% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
      • 0.057% fail on Requirements
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition (37% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 5.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (49% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system (33% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions (71% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.29% fail on Tank
      • 0.057% fail on Pipe
      • 0.057% fail on Cap
      • 0.057% fail on System
  • 4.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition
    • 1.5% fail on Doors (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Passengers other (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.52% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.52% fail on Chassis
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.11% fail on Load security
      • 0.11% fail on Access panel (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 2.3% fail on Steering (51% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering system (57% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end (44% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack (78% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Free play
        • 0.057% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.057% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.057% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.34% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.23% fail on Steering control
      • 0.11% fail on Steering lock (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering column
    • 0.057% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.75% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.69% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Condition
  • 0.75% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.75% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages