Rover 75 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
56.2% pass rate
from 390 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 75 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (43% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 10% fail on Suspension arms (99% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Pins and bushes (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Suspension arm (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.51% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (87% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (73% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.51% fail on Linkage
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.3% fail on Springs
      • 2.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.1% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.26% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.26% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.26% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.26% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.77% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.77% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.77% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.77% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.77% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.51% fail on Electrical wiring (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Horn
    • 0.26% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 6.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance (75% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Rbt (74% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.77% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.77% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.77% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.77% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.51% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal
    • 0.26% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.26% fail on Servos
    • 0.26% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.26% fail on Lever
  • 6.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (37% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.0% fail on Transmission (70% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.0% fail on Joints
    • 0.51% fail on Body
      • 0.26% fail on Panel
      • 0.26% fail on Other body component
    • 0.51% fail on Doors
      • 0.51% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.51% fail on Door condition
    • 0.26% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.26% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 5.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
  • 2.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (77% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (76% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition (77% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.51% fail on Catalyst emissions (92% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.26% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.26% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.51% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.51% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.51% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.51% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages