MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Rover » 75 » 1999

Rover 75 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
56.7% pass rate
from 245 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 75 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Pins and bushes (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.4% fail on Suspension arm (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 9.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Linkage
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
    • 8.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (78% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Springs
      • 3.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.7% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.41% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.2% fail on Sub-frame (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.41% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.41% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.82% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.82% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.82% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.82% fail on Rbt
          • 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.41% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 5.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.82% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.82% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.41% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.41% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.82% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.82% fail on Lever
    • 0.82% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.82% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.41% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.41% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.41% fail on Servos
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.41% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.41% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.82% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.41% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.41% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.41% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.41% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.41% fail on View to rear
      • 0.41% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.41% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.41% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.41% fail on Chassis
      • 0.41% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.41% fail on Transmission
      • 0.41% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.41% fail on Joints
    • 0.41% fail on Seats
      • 0.41% fail on Driver's seat
  • 5.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (55% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.4% fail on Spark ignition (67% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.82% fail on Catalyst emissions (86% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.82% fail on Steering
    • 0.41% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.41% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.41% fail on Power steering
      • 0.41% fail on Other components
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.41% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages