Rover 600 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
49.3% pass rate
from 773 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 600 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Brakes (41% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (93% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 16% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Rear wheels (91% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.52% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.0% fail on Components
        • 5.6% fail on Pipes
        • 0.65% fail on Hoses
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.2% fail on Leaks (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.6% fail on Parking brake (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS
    • 1.0% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.26% fail on Pivot (60 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.4% fail on Stop lamp (50% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps (57% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Front lamps (64% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.91% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.91% fail on Battery
    • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.52% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.26% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 17% fail on Suspension (19% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Drive shafts (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Front drive shafts (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 9.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas (55% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Component mounting (49% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.91% fail on Anti-roll bars (82% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (84% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings (79% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Front
      • 0.13% fail on Rear
    • 0.39% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers (83% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition (83% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
  • 10.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.4% fail on Emissions (35% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.65% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Hose (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on System
  • 8.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.39% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.26% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.91% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.4% fail on Steering system
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.9% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering
      • 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.26% fail on Other components
      • 0.13% fail on Rams
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (66% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Body condition (69% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.26% fail on Chassis
    • 0.26% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.13% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.13% fail on Body security
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages