Rover 600 MOT Results

Registered in 1998
62.2% pass rate
from 238 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 600 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes (77% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.84% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.42% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt
          • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.84% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.42% fail on Pedal
    • 0.84% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.42% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.42% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.42% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.42% fail on Lever
    • 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.42% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.42% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (57% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Transmission (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 7.6% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Hose
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.3% fail on Doors
      • 0.42% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.42% fail on Door condition
      • 0.42% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.42% fail on Door condition
      • 0.42% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.42% fail on Door condition
    • 0.84% fail on Body
      • 0.84% fail on Panel
    • 0.42% fail on Chassis
      • 0.42% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.42% fail on Bumpers
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 5.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.84% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.84% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage
    • 0.84% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.84% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.42% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.42% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.42% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 9.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.42% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.42% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.42% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.42% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.42% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.42% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.42% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.42% fail on View to rear
      • 0.42% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.42% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.42% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.42% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.84% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.42% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.42% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.42% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.42% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.42% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.84% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Size/type
  • 2.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.84% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.84% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.84% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.84% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.42% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.42% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages