Rover 600 MOT Results
Registered in 199862.2% pass rate
from 238 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 600 is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Brakes
(77% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt
- 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.84% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.42% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.42% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt
-
5.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.42% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.42% fail on
Rbt
- 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.42% fail on
Rbt
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.84% fail on Hand lever
- 0.42% fail on Pedal
-
0.84% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.42% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.42% fail on Brake pads
-
0.42% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.42% fail on Lever
-
0.42% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.42% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.42% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(57% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(180% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(180% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.9% fail on
Fuel system
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Hose
-
1.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.3% fail on
Doors
-
0.42% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.42% fail on Door condition
-
0.42% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.42% fail on Door condition
-
0.42% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.42% fail on Door condition
-
0.42% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.84% fail on
Body
- 0.84% fail on Panel
-
0.42% fail on
Chassis
- 0.42% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.42% fail on Bumpers
-
7.6% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
12% fail on
Suspension
- 5.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint
- 0.84% fail on Suspension arm
-
1.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.84% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.42% fail on Linkage
- 0.84% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.84% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.42% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.42% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.42% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
9.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.42% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
1.3% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.42% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.42% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.42% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.42% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.42% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
8.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.42% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.42% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
8.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.0% fail on
Visibility
- 4.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.9% fail on Washers
-
0.42% fail on
View to rear
- 0.42% fail on Mirrors
-
8.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.42% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.42% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.42% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.84% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.42% fail on Headlamp
- 0.42% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.42% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.42% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.42% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
3.8% fail on
Steering
-
2.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint
- 0.42% fail on Locking devices
-
1.7% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.7% fail on Steering rack
-
2.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.84% fail on Condition
- 0.42% fail on Size/type
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.84% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.84% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.84% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.84% fail on Registration plates
-
0.42% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.42% fail on Speedometer