Rover 600 MOT Results
Registered in 199757.9% pass rate
from 233 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 600 is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(61% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(66% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(190% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.43% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
-
2.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
- 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(190% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
-
0.86% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.86% fail on Brake discs
-
0.86% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.43% fail on Lever
- 0.43% fail on Clevis joint
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Hand lever
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.43% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.43% fail on Other components
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(66% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
6.9% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Flexible couplings
-
6.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.86% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.43% fail on Pipe
-
0.86% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.86% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.43% fail on
Chassis
- 0.43% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.43% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.43% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.43% fail on
Doors
-
0.43% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.43% fail on Door condition
-
0.43% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
6.9% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.9% fail on Stop lamp (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.43% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.43% fail on Horn
- 0.86% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.43% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.43% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
-
10% fail on
Suspension
-
6.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.9% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Linkage
- 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.43% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.43% fail on Shock absorbers
-
6.4% fail on
Suspension arms
-
6.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.86% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.86% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
6.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.0% fail on
Visibility
- 4.3% fail on Wipers
-
0.86% fail on
View to rear
- 0.86% fail on Mirrors
- 0.86% fail on Washers
- 0.43% fail on Bonnet
-
3.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.1% fail on
Steering gear
- 2.1% fail on Steering rack
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end
-
2.1% fail on
Steering gear
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.1% fail on
Tyres
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.86% fail on Condition
-
0.86% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.86% fail on Registration plates