Rover 600 MOT Results

Registered in 1996

53.6% pass rate

from 110 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 600 is unusually good or bad.

19% fail on Brakes (72% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 13% fail on Brake performance
  - 9.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 9.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 4.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 4.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
      - 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 3.6% fail on Rbt
      - 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.7% fail on Rbt
      - 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 2.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.91% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.91% fail on Hand lever
- 0.91% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.91% fail on Lever
- 0.91% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 0.91% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.91% fail on Brake discs
18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.6% fail on Headlamps
  - 3.6% fail on Headlamp
- 3.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.7% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.91% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
  - 0.91% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 10% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Transmission
  - 5.5% fail on Drive shafts
    - 4.5% fail on Joints
    - 0.91% fail on Drive shaft
  - 0.91% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.91% fail on Joints
- 1.8% fail on Fuel system
  - 1.8% fail on Pipe (8 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Doors
  - 0.91% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.91% fail on Door condition
  - 0.91% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.91% fail on Door condition
- 0.91% fail on Chassis
  - 0.91% fail on Chassis condition
12% fail on Suspension
- 6.4% fail on Suspension arms
  - 4.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
- 4.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 2.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.91% fail on Linkage
- 0.91% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.91% fail on Ball joint dust cover
9.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 9.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 9.1% fail on Spark ignition
    - 7.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.91% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.91% fail on Catalytic converter
    - 0.91% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
8.2% fail on Visibility
- 6.4% fail on Washers
- 1.8% fail on Wipers
6.4% fail on Steering
- 3.6% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 3.6% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.91% fail on Locking devices
- 2.7% fail on Steering gear
  - 2.7% fail on Steering rack
5.5% fail on Tyres
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.91% fail on Size/type
2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.91% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.91% fail on Condition
0.91% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.91% fail on Attachment