Rover 600 MOT Results

Registered in 1995

54.1% pass rate

from 74 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 600 is unusually good or bad.

23% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 15% fail on Brake performance
  - 14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 5.4% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 5.4% fail on Rbt (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      - 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      - 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
    - 4.1% fail on Rbt
      - 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
  - 2.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      - 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 5.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 5.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Pedal
  - 1.4% fail on Hand lever
- 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.7% fail on Brake pads
- 1.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 1.4% fail on Brake fluid
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses
15% fail on Visibility
- 8.1% fail on Wipers
- 8.1% fail on Washers
15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 11% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.7% fail on Headlamp
- 2.7% fail on Position lamps (12 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 2.7% fail on Position lamp (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.4% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 5.4% fail on Transmission
  - 5.4% fail on Drive shafts
    - 5.4% fail on Joints
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.4% fail on Chassis
  - 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.4% fail on Body
  - 1.4% fail on Panel
- 1.4% fail on Doors
  - 1.4% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 1.4% fail on Door condition
- 1.4% fail on Seats
  - 1.4% fail on Passenger's seat
6.8% fail on Suspension
- 4.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.7% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.4% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.4% fail on Other suspension component
  - 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
5.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 5.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 5.4% fail on Spark ignition
    - 4.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
4.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 4.1% fail on Seat belts
  - 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 1.4% fail on Condition
2.7% fail on Steering
- 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 2.7% fail on Track rod end