Rover 600 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
57.8% pass rate
from 135 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 600 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 19% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.5% fail on Hand lever (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Pedal
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.5% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.74% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.74% fail on Other braking system component
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.1% fail on Transmission (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Body (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Panel (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.74% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.74% fail on Chassis
      • 0.74% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.74% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.74% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.74% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.74% fail on Horn
  • 9.6% fail on Suspension
    • 4.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.5% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.74% fail on Linkage
  • 8.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.74% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.74% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.74% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.74% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
  • 7.4% fail on Visibility
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.74% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.74% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.74% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.74% fail on Washers
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.74% fail on Size/type
  • 4.4% fail on Steering
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
    • 2.2% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Operation
      • 0.74% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.74% fail on Other components
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas

Search Good Garages