Rover 600 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
50.8% pass rate
from 193 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 600 is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 15% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.52% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.52% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.0% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.52% fail on Switch
    • 0.52% fail on Battery
    • 0.52% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.52% fail on Lamp
    • 0.52% fail on Horn
    • 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 24% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 15% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Rear wheels (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.7% fail on Components
        • 5.2% fail on Pipes
        • 0.52% fail on Hoses
    • 3.6% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.52% fail on ABS
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 6.7% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 6.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.52% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.7% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.0% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.52% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.52% fail on Rear
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.7% fail on Emissions
    • 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on Cap
      • 0.52% fail on Tank
      • 0.52% fail on System
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 10% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.52% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering system
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.6% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 1.0% fail on Other components
      • 0.52% fail on Operation
    • 0.52% fail on Steering operation
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
  • 2.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.52% fail on Requirements
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
  • 1.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (72% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Body condition
    • 0.52% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.52% fail on Chassis
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages