Rover 600 MOT Results
Registered in 199554.1% pass rate
from 74 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 600 is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Brakes
(110% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Rbt
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
5.4% fail on
Rbt
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt
- 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt
-
2.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
14% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Pedal
- 1.4% fail on Hand lever
-
2.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 1.4% fail on Brake fluid
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Visibility
- 8.1% fail on Wipers
- 8.1% fail on Washers
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 11% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp
-
2.7% fail on
Position lamps
(12 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Position lamp (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.4% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
5.4% fail on
Transmission
-
5.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 5.4% fail on Joints
-
5.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.4% fail on
Chassis
- 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.4% fail on
Body
- 1.4% fail on Panel
-
1.4% fail on
Doors
-
1.4% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 1.4% fail on Door condition
-
1.4% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
1.4% fail on
Seats
- 1.4% fail on Passenger's seat
-
5.4% fail on
Transmission
-
6.8% fail on
Suspension
- 4.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.4% fail on
Other suspension component
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
5.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.4% fail on
Spark ignition
-
5.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.7% fail on
Steering
-
2.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.7% fail on Track rod end
-
2.7% fail on
Steering linkage components