Rover 45 MOT Results
Registered in 200552.6% pass rate
from 458 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 45 is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.44% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
3.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(200% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(200% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Switch
-
3.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(200% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.66% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Horn (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Battery(ies)
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.66% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.66% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.44% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (81% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.22% fail on Position lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.22% fail on Switch
-
0.22% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
16% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(94% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Transmission
(140% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Flexible couplings
-
8.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Exhaust system (75% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Other passenger's door
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.22% fail on Catch
-
1.5% fail on
Other passenger's door
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Chassis
- 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.66% fail on Bumpers
-
0.44% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on Tank
- 0.22% fail on Pipe
-
0.44% fail on
Seats
- 0.44% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.22% fail on Floor
-
8.7% fail on
Transmission
(140% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
13% fail on
Suspension
- 6.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.87% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.87% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.87% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.44% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.22% fail on
Springs
-
0.22% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.22% fail on Coil spring
-
0.22% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.22% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.22% fail on Linkage
-
8.5% fail on
Brakes
(36% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
- 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.22% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (61% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.44% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt
- 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt
-
4.1% fail on
Service brake performance
- 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.87% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.87% fail on Brake discs
-
0.66% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.66% fail on Brake pads
-
0.87% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.66% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.66% fail on Hand lever
-
0.44% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.44% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.22% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.22% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.87% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.2% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.22% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.22% fail on Other leaks
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.4% fail on
Visibility
- 3.9% fail on Washers
- 3.7% fail on Wipers
-
0.44% fail on
View to rear
- 0.44% fail on Mirrors
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.8% fail on Condition
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.66% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.44% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
-
0.44% fail on
Steering
(89% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.22% fail on Steering rack
-
0.22% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.22% fail on Track rod end
-
0.22% fail on
Steering gear