Rover 45 MOT Results
Registered in 200353.3% pass rate
from 949 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 45 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(77% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Transmission
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.32% fail on Joints
-
7.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Chassis
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Doors
-
0.63% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.63% fail on Door condition
-
0.11% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
-
0.11% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
-
0.63% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.53% fail on
Seats
- 0.32% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.21% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.42% fail on Bumpers
- 0.32% fail on Floor (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.11% fail on Tank
- 0.11% fail on Pipe
-
0.21% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.11% fail on Bracket
-
0.11% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.11% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.11% fail on
Body
- 0.11% fail on Panel
-
0.11% fail on
Cabs
- 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
-
7.5% fail on
Transmission
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
16% fail on
Suspension
- 8.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.5% fail on Ball joint
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.0% fail on
Sub-frames
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.74% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.53% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.42% fail on
Springs
(89% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Coil springs
(95% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.21% fail on
Coil springs
(95% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.21% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(96% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.11% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(19% better than other 2003 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamps
(60% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.11% fail on Switch
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.95% fail on Battery(ies) (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Horn
-
0.74% fail on
Direction indicators
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Flashing type
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.21% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.21% fail on Individual direction indicators (86% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Flashing type
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (74% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
8.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Service brake performance
(63% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
(64% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (55% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.11% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.11% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
(64% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.95% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.95% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.95% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.95% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.95% fail on
Rbt
- 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.32% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.95% fail on
Rbt
- 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.8% fail on
Service brake performance
(63% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(51% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.11% fail on Brake linings
-
0.21% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(81% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Brake discs (81% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.74% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.74% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.53% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.42% fail on Pedal
- 0.11% fail on Hand lever
-
0.32% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.11% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.21% fail on Lever
-
0.21% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.11% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.11% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.11% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
8.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.2% fail on
Visibility
- 4.2% fail on Wipers
- 3.0% fail on Washers
- 0.32% fail on Bonnet
-
0.11% fail on
View to rear
- 0.11% fail on Mirrors
-
6.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested (95% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.32% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.21% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.42% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.32% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.11% fail on Other leaks
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 0.42% fail on Size/type
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.63% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.8% fail on
Steering
-
1.5% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.5% fail on Steering rack
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(68% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (64% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Power steering
- 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.11% fail on Operation
- 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.74% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.74% fail on Registration plates
-
0.21% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
-
0.11% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.11% fail on Speedometer