MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Rover » 45 » 2000

Rover 45 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
47.7% pass rate
from 1,758 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 45 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (13% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Component mounting (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Subframe mounting (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Spring mounting
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10% fail on Front drive shafts (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.1% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (68% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (72% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (76% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (83% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (70% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on Front suspension joints (55% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Wheel bearings (76% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Rear (72% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Front (85% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Shock absorbers (72% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (96% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
      • 0.057% fail on Attachment
    • 0.057% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
    • 0.057% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.057% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (14% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Position lamps (23% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Front lamps (45% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.057% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (26% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps (33% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp (30% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.46% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.28% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.2% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.057% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.057% fail on Horn
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (28% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Front wheels (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.057% fail on Brake operation
    • 6.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.2% fail on Components
        • 5.2% fail on Pipes
        • 0.057% fail on Hoses
        • 0.057% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.68% fail on Leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.28% fail on Brake discs (67% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.11% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.057% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.2% fail on ABS
    • 0.74% fail on Restricted movement (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake (63% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
        • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 9.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.51% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.057% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (20% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Emissions (47% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Cap
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
      • 0.057% fail on Tank
      • 0.057% fail on System
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Size/type
  • 7.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (51% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Prescribed areas (67% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Requirements
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 6.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (71% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Body condition
    • 1.7% fail on Doors (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Passengers other (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.057% fail on Drivers
    • 1.6% fail on Vehicle structure (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Seats (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers
    • 0.057% fail on Body security
  • 3.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.8% fail on Steering system
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack (72% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.68% fail on Power steering
      • 0.40% fail on Operation
      • 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
      • 0.057% fail on Pump
    • 0.23% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.057% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment
    • 0.057% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages