Rover 400 MOT Results
Registered in 200045.1% pass rate
from 144 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 400 is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 13% fail on Headlamp aim (82% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.5% fail on Rear lamps
- 2.1% fail on Front lamps
- 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
-
2.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.69% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Battery
-
27% fail on
Suspension
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
(160% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Component mounting (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Spring mounting
-
12% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
12% fail on
Front drive shafts
(180% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 12% fail on Constant velocity joints (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
12% fail on
Front drive shafts
(180% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.69% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.69% fail on Linkage condition
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.1% fail on
Trailing arms
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.69% fail on Condition
-
0.69% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.69% fail on Rear
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
(160% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
19% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(78% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 12% fail on Emissions (86% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.5% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.69% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.69% fail on Tank
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
9.0% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.9% fail on Front wheels
- 4.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.1% fail on Brake imbalance
- 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
-
7.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.9% fail on
Components
- 6.9% fail on Pipes
- 0.69% fail on Operation
-
6.9% fail on
Components
-
1.4% fail on
Hub components
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.69% fail on ABS
- 0.69% fail on Restricted movement
-
9.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.3% fail on Washers
- 4.2% fail on Wipers
- 0.69% fail on Bonnet
- 0.69% fail on Windscreen
- 0.69% fail on Mirrors
-
9.7% fail on
Tyres
- 9.0% fail on Tread depth
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
6.3% fail on
Steering
-
5.6% fail on
Steering system
- 5.6% fail on Track rod end
-
0.69% fail on
Power steering
- 0.69% fail on Operation
- 0.69% fail on Other components
-
5.6% fail on
Steering system
-
4.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.1% fail on Body condition
-
1.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.4% fail on Chassis
-
0.69% fail on
Seats
- 0.69% fail on Drivers
-
1.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate
-
0.69% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.69% fail on Condition
-
0.69% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.69% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.69% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.69% fail on
Seat belts