Rover 400 MOT Results
Registered in 199655.5% pass rate
from 128 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 400 is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Suspension
- 8.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.7% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.78% fail on
Springs
-
0.78% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.78% fail on Coil spring
-
0.78% fail on
Coil springs
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
5.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
- 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
-
5.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.78% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.78% fail on Brake pads
-
0.78% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.78% fail on Brake discs
-
0.78% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.78% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.78% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.78% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.78% fail on Battery(ies)
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
8.6% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.78% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.78% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.78% fail on
Chassis
- 0.78% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.78% fail on Bumpers
-
8.6% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 6.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.78% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.78% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.78% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
7.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.78% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.78% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
7.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
5.5% fail on
Visibility
- 4.7% fail on Wipers
- 1.6% fail on Washers
- 0.78% fail on Bonnet
-
3.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.78% fail on Condition
-
1.6% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.6% fail on Registration plates
-
0.78% fail on
Steering
-
0.78% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.78% fail on Track rod end
-
0.78% fail on
Steering linkage components
Read the Honest John Review
-
Rover 400 (1995 - 1999)
Rover's version of the Honda Civic. Quite well equipped and a reasonable drive in its day.