Rover 400 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
59.0% pass rate
from 393 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 400 is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 8.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 8.1% fail on Component mounting (59% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.25% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.1% fail on Trailing arms (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.76% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.51% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 0.76% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.76% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.51% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 14% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (31% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Front lamps
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.76% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.25% fail on Switch
    • 0.76% fail on Battery
    • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Fog lamp (82% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.76% fail on Headlamps (74% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Horn
    • 0.25% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.25% fail on Lamp
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.1% fail on Emissions
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.51% fail on Cap
      • 0.51% fail on System
      • 0.25% fail on Tank
  • 7.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.51% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.9% fail on Brakes (54% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (74% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Components (76% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Pipes (71% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Valves
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.25% fail on Leaks
    • 1.3% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
  • 6.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.25% fail on Requirements
    • 0.25% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.25% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
  • 4.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.5% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis
    • 0.51% fail on Seats
      • 0.51% fail on Drivers
    • 0.25% fail on Body security
    • 0.25% fail on Load security
      • 0.25% fail on Bootlid
  • 3.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering system
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.51% fail on Free play
        • 0.51% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.25% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
        • 0.25% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.76% fail on Power steering
      • 0.51% fail on Operation
      • 0.51% fail on Other components
    • 0.25% fail on Steering control
      • 0.25% fail on Steering column
    • 0.25% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages