Rover 400 MOT Results
Registered in 199564.2% pass rate
from 162 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 400 is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.3% fail on
Transmission
-
4.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.3% fail on Joints
-
4.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.9% fail on
Boot lid
(33 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Boot lid condition (39 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.62% fail on Tank
- 0.62% fail on Pipe
-
4.3% fail on
Transmission
-
9.9% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.62% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.62% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp
-
1.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.62% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.62% fail on Horn
-
9.9% fail on
Suspension
- 4.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.62% fail on
Axles
- 0.62% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.62% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.62% fail on Pins and bushes
-
8.0% fail on
Visibility
- 4.3% fail on Wipers
- 3.7% fail on Washers
-
7.4% fail on
Tyres
(170% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Tread depth (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
5.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.2% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.62% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.62% fail on Other leaks
-
4.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.3% fail on
Brakes
(61% better than other 1995 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.62% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
-
2.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.62% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Steering
-
0.62% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.62% fail on Steering rack
-
0.62% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.62% fail on Track rod end
-
0.62% fail on
Power steering
- 0.62% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.62% fail on
Steering gear
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.62% fail on Condition
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.62% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.62% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Rover 400 (1995 - 1999)
Rover's version of the Honda Civic. Quite well equipped and a reasonable drive in its day.