Rover 400 MOT Results
Registered in 199455.4% pass rate
from 112 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 400 is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.89% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.8% fail on
Position lamps
(7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Position lamp (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.89% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.89% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.89% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.89% fail on Battery(ies)
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
13% fail on
Suspension
- 8.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
1.8% fail on
Springs
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.8% fail on Coil spring
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
-
1.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.89% fail on Ball joint
- 0.89% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.89% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.89% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.89% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.89% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
9.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 9.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.89% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.89% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
9.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.0% fail on
Visibility
- 2.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.7% fail on Washers
- 0.89% fail on Bonnet
-
0.89% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.89% fail on Windscreen
-
0.89% fail on
View to rear
- 0.89% fail on Mirrors
-
8.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
2.7% fail on
Transmission
-
2.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.7% fail on Joints
-
2.7% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.89% fail on
Doors
-
0.89% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.89% fail on Door condition
-
0.89% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.89% fail on
Cabs
- 0.89% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.7% fail on
Transmission
-
6.3% fail on
Brakes
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
- 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
-
3.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.89% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.89% fail on Pedal
-
0.89% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.89% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.89% fail on Size/type
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.89% fail on Condition
- 0.89% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.89% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts