Rover 25 MOT Results
Registered in 200557.1% pass rate
from 2,258 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 25 is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
6.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.7% fail on Front lamps
- 2.2% fail on Rear lamps (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.089% fail on All position lamps
- 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.044% fail on Matched pair
- 0.044% fail on Dipswitch
- 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (39% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Battery (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Tell tale (19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Switch (26 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Individual lamps (48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.044% fail on Tell tales
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Hazard warning
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.089% fail on Electrical wiring
-
6.6% fail on
Position lamps
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(33% better than other 2005 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.18% fail on Drive shafts
-
9.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(75% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.89% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.71% fail on Component mounting
- 0.18% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.80% fail on
Wheel bearings
(47% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Front
- 0.31% fail on Rear (66% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Suspension arms
(90% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (89% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Front suspension joints (72% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.044% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.044% fail on Attachment
-
0.18% fail on
Shock absorbers
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.089% fail on
Coil springs
(98% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Condition
- 0.044% fail on Location
-
0.089% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
0.044% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.044% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
9.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Tyres
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
- 3.9% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Valve stem
-
8.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.9% fail on Wipers (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Washers (38% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Windscreen
- 0.27% fail on Mirrors
-
7.1% fail on
Steering
(78% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Steering system
(72% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Steering rack
- 0.089% fail on Ball joint
- 0.089% fail on Steering arm
- 0.044% fail on Drag link end
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Operation
- 0.22% fail on Rams (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.044% fail on
Steering control
- 0.044% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.044% fail on Steering operation
-
6.2% fail on
Steering system
(72% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(32% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Exhaust system (65% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Emissions (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.089% fail on System
- 0.044% fail on Pipe
- 0.044% fail on Cap
-
6.2% fail on
Brakes
(53% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
(54% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Front wheels
- 0.66% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance (91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Rear wheels (91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.089% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.044% fail on Brake operation
-
1.6% fail on
Hub components
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads (42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Brake discs (81% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(70% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Components
(70% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Pipes (65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.044% fail on Hoses
- 0.089% fail on Operation
- 0.044% fail on Leaks
-
1.1% fail on
Components
(70% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on ABS (80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Restricted movement
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
(54% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.4% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.044% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.75% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.35% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.044% fail on Attachment
-
1.4% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
1.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.89% fail on
Doors
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Passengers other
- 0.62% fail on Body condition
-
0.27% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.27% fail on Chassis
-
0.13% fail on
Seats
- 0.089% fail on Drivers
- 0.044% fail on Passengers
- 0.044% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.044% fail on
Load security
- 0.044% fail on Access panel
-
0.89% fail on
Doors
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Registration plate (60% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.089% fail on Attachment
- 0.044% fail on Condition