Rover 25 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
57.1% pass rate
from 2,258 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 25 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear lamps (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.044% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.044% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (39% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Battery (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Tell tale (19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Switch (26 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (50% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (50% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Individual lamps (48% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.044% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.49% fail on Hazard warning (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.089% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 13% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Front drive shafts (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 9.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.89% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.71% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.18% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings (47% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Front
      • 0.31% fail on Rear (66% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Suspension arms (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (89% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Front suspension joints (72% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.044% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.044% fail on Attachment
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers (87% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.089% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Condition
      • 0.044% fail on Location
    • 0.089% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.089% fail on Condition
    • 0.044% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.044% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (38% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.27% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.1% fail on Steering (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Steering system (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.089% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.089% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.044% fail on Drag link end
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Operation
      • 0.22% fail on Rams (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.044% fail on Steering control
      • 0.044% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.044% fail on Steering operation
  • 6.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (32% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system (65% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Emissions (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.089% fail on System
      • 0.044% fail on Pipe
      • 0.044% fail on Cap
  • 6.2% fail on Brakes (53% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance (54% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.66% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance (91% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Rear wheels (91% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.089% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.044% fail on Brake operation
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components (55% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (42% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake discs (81% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Components (70% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Pipes (65% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.044% fail on Hoses
      • 0.089% fail on Operation
      • 0.044% fail on Leaks
    • 0.18% fail on ABS (80% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Restricted movement
  • 2.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.044% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.75% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
      • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.044% fail on Attachment
  • 1.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.89% fail on Doors (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.62% fail on Body condition
    • 0.27% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.27% fail on Chassis
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.089% fail on Drivers
      • 0.044% fail on Passengers
    • 0.044% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.044% fail on Load security
      • 0.044% fail on Access panel
  • 0.31% fail on Registration plates and VIN (60% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plate (60% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.089% fail on Attachment
    • 0.044% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages