Rover 25 MOT Results
Registered in 200353.2% pass rate
from 5,041 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 25 is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (24% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Stop lamp (18% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim (28% better than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Position lamps
(34% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Rear lamps (45% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Front lamps (57% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.020% fail on All position lamps
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
(30% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp (29% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Switch
-
0.020% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.020% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 3.0% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.42% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(47% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(48% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Individual lamps (41% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (70% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.020% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.020% fail on Switch
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(48% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Horn
-
0.22% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.20% fail on Lamp (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Switch
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.079% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.020% fail on Rear reflectors
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(12% better than other 2003 cars)
-
15% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
15% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 15% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Couplings
-
0.12% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
-
15% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.5% fail on Component mounting
- 0.32% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.020% fail on Spring mounting
-
0.87% fail on
Suspension arms
(81% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Attachment
-
0.42% fail on
Wheel bearings
(76% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Front (67% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Rear (83% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Shock absorbers
(72% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Front suspension joints (78% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(96% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (96% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (96% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Attachment
-
0.099% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.099% fail on Condition
-
0.079% fail on
Macpherson strut
(83% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(76% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (82% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Attachment
-
0.040% fail on
Coil springs
(99% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Condition (99% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.020% fail on Attachment
-
0.020% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.020% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
15% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(32% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Brake performance
(37% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Front wheels
- 1.2% fail on Rear wheels (68% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Service brake performance (54% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(38% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Components
(34% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Pipes (29% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Hoses
- 0.040% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.020% fail on Servos
- 0.060% fail on Leaks (83% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Components
(34% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Hub components
(40% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads (27% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Brake discs (81% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.020% fail on Brake linings
- 0.020% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
0.91% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.91% fail on Condition
-
0.34% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.34% fail on
Pedal
- 0.26% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.079% fail on Condition
-
0.34% fail on
Pedal
- 0.26% fail on ABS (75% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.020% fail on Locking devices
-
5.2% fail on
Brake performance
(37% better than other 2003 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.6% fail on Wipers (28% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Washers (33% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Windscreen
- 0.22% fail on Mirrors
- 0.20% fail on Bonnet
-
8.1% fail on
Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Condition
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth (27% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Size/type
- 0.060% fail on Valve stem
-
8.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.5% fail on Exhaust system (50% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Emissions
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (71% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Fuel system
(48% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Tank
- 0.079% fail on System
- 0.040% fail on Cap (85% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Pipe
-
3.8% fail on
Steering
(26% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Steering system
(26% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Track rod end
- 0.34% fail on Steering rack (60% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint
- 0.020% fail on Drag link end
-
0.020% fail on
Other components
- 0.020% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.40% fail on
Power steering
- 0.12% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Other components
- 0.099% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.040% fail on Drive system
- 0.040% fail on Rams
- 0.020% fail on Pump
- 0.060% fail on Steering operation
-
3.4% fail on
Steering system
(26% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(28% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.61% fail on Condition
- 0.099% fail on Requirements
- 0.020% fail on Attachment
-
0.69% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(54% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.69% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (51% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.77% fail on Body condition
-
0.46% fail on
Doors
- 0.24% fail on Passengers front
- 0.12% fail on Drivers
- 0.099% fail on Passengers other (71% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.22% fail on Chassis
-
0.16% fail on
Seats
- 0.16% fail on Drivers
- 0.079% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.079% fail on
Load security
- 0.060% fail on Bootlid
- 0.020% fail on Tailgate
-
0.67% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(39% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Registration plate (39% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.26% fail on Attachment
- 0.12% fail on Condition