Rover 25 MOT Results

Registered in 2003
57.5% pass rate
from 2,933 tests in 2020
(11% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 25 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (93% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 13% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 13% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 13% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.58% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.72% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.72% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.38% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
    • 0.34% fail on Chassis
      • 0.34% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.34% fail on Body
      • 0.27% fail on Panel
      • 0.068% fail on Other body component
    • 0.27% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
      • 0.10% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.034% fail on System
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.034% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.10% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.10% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.10% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.068% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.034% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.034% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.034% fail on Floor
    • 0.034% fail on Cabs
      • 0.034% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (19% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps (44% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp (42% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device (77% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Position lamps (31% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp (31% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.34% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment (51% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies) (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Horn
      • 0.068% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (44% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (44% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (70% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.41% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Main beam tell-tale (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.068% fail on Switch
  • 9.8% fail on Brakes (36% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance (36% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.61% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.034% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (82% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.72% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.72% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (83% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (82% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.034% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (33% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (48% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (31% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.27% fail on Brake discs and drums (78% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Brake discs (78% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.31% fail on Pedal
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
    • 0.34% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (74% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Anti-lock braking system (69% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.068% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.068% fail on Servos
    • 0.034% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.034% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.034% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.034% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.034% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility (20% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (27% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.10% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (24% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (22% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (34% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.068% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.44% fail on Compression ignition (66% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (81% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.068% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.034% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.31% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.034% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.034% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 5.4% fail on Suspension (70% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (44% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (78% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover (56% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.034% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.41% fail on Shock absorbers (71% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Wheel bearings (79% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.034% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.24% fail on Anti-roll bars (96% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (70% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.034% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.17% fail on Springs (95% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Coil spring (98% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Mounting
      • 0.068% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.10% fail on Other suspension component (80% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.034% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.034% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.034% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.034% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (39% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 3.9% fail on Steering (21% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.034% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.31% fail on Steering gear (61% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Steering rack (64% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Operation
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
      • 0.068% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.068% fail on Pump
    • 0.068% fail on Steering column
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
    • 0.89% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (40% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.034% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages