Rover 25 MOT Results

Registered in 2002
55.5% pass rate
from 2,619 tests in 2020
(8.0% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 25 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (78% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 12% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 11% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.76% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Belts
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (49% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.99% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.42% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
      • 0.19% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
    • 0.31% fail on Chassis
      • 0.31% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.27% fail on Fuel system (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.038% fail on Tank
      • 0.038% fail on Hose
    • 0.19% fail on Body
      • 0.15% fail on Panel
      • 0.038% fail on Other body component
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.076% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.076% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.15% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.11% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.038% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.076% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.038% fail on Towbar
      • 0.038% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.038% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.038% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.038% fail on Floor
    • 0.038% fail on Undertray
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (19% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (32% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (28% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (80% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp (37% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device (74% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps (42% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Position lamp (40% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment (86% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Horn
      • 0.038% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Switch
      • 0.038% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.038% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (46% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (46% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.23% fail on Side repeaters (69% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Brakes (24% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Brake performance (18% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (68% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.038% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (49% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (66% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (64% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (82% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.038% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.038% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (41% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.38% fail on Brake discs and drums (69% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Brake discs (72% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.076% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.038% fail on Cable
        • 0.038% fail on Lever
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.46% fail on Lever
    • 0.38% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.31% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Anti-lock braking system (74% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.27% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.076% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.076% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.076% fail on Servos
    • 0.038% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.038% fail on Other components
  • 7.5% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on View to rear
      • 0.61% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.23% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.038% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (39% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.038% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.038% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.076% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.53% fail on Compression ignition (53% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (76% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.038% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.038% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.34% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.038% fail on Other leaks
  • 7.0% fail on Suspension (62% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (51% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint (76% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.53% fail on Shock absorbers (62% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.31% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.38% fail on Wheel bearings (76% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Anti-roll bars (97% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.076% fail on Other suspension component (86% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.038% fail on Springs
      • 0.038% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.038% fail on Mounting
    • 0.038% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.038% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.038% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.038% fail on Suspension rod
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres (22% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth (31% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 4.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.5% fail on Steering (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Steering linkage components (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Track rod end (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.34% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.038% fail on Operation
    • 0.11% fail on Steering gear (87% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack (86% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.038% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.038% fail on Steering play
      • 0.038% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.61% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 0.038% fail on Condition
  • 0.038% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.038% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages