Rover 200 MOT Results
Registered in 199958.6% pass rate
from 485 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 200 is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.41% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamps
(72% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.21% fail on Position lamp
-
13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(63% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(65% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(68% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.21% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.82% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.62% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.21% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(68% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(65% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
9.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(85% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Rbt
(90% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.2% fail on
Rbt
(90% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
-
5.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(85% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.82% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.62% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.62% fail on Brake pads
-
0.41% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.41% fail on Brake discs
-
0.21% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.21% fail on Linkage
-
0.62% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.41% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.41% fail on Lever
-
0.21% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
-
9.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
5.8% fail on
Transmission
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(96% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Joints (99% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.62% fail on Joints
-
5.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(96% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.62% fail on
Chassis
- 0.62% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.41% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.41% fail on System (18 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Bumpers
-
0.21% fail on
Body
- 0.21% fail on Panel
-
0.21% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.21% fail on Boot lid condition
-
5.8% fail on
Transmission
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Suspension
(45% better than other 1999 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
1.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(76% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Ball joint
- 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.41% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.41% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.41% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.41% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.21% fail on
Axles
- 0.21% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.21% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.21% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.21% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
7.4% fail on
Visibility
- 4.5% fail on Wipers
- 2.9% fail on Washers
-
0.21% fail on
View to rear
- 0.21% fail on Mirrors
-
5.6% fail on
Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.41% fail on Condition
- 1.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.4% fail on
Steering
(61% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.82% fail on Track rod end
-
0.41% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.41% fail on Steering rack
-
0.21% fail on
Power steering
- 0.21% fail on Operation
-
0.82% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.62% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.62% fail on Registration plates
-
0.41% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Rover 200 (1995 - 1999)
Smart styling. The Vi is quick and economical, the 1.6 CVT responsive. Feels compact in town yet comfortable on the motorway.