Rover 200 MOT Results
Registered in 199862.0% pass rate
from 545 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 200 is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(75% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(160% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(170% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(170% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Service brake performance
(150% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Rbt
(150% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.8% fail on
Rbt
(150% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 0.55% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
7.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(160% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.73% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.73% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.73% fail on Brake pads
-
0.73% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.55% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.37% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.18% fail on Valves
-
0.55% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.55% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.18% fail on Lever
- 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.18% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(75% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.55% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.55% fail on Horn
- 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamps
(63% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.92% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.92% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.73% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.92% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(44% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
(45% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.37% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.18% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.18% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.18% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.73% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.37% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
(45% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.37% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.18% fail on Other leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(44% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.2% fail on
Transmission
-
4.2% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.2% fail on Joints
-
4.2% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.73% fail on
Chassis
- 0.73% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.55% fail on
Doors
-
0.18% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.18% fail on Door condition
-
0.18% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.18% fail on Door condition
-
0.18% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.18% fail on Door condition
-
0.18% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.37% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.18% fail on Tank
- 0.18% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.37% fail on
Boot lid
(6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.18% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.18% fail on
Body
- 0.18% fail on Panel
-
0.18% fail on
Seats
- 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat
-
4.2% fail on
Transmission
-
8.6% fail on
Suspension
(35% better than other 1998 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.92% fail on
Suspension arms
(75% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Ball joint
- 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.55% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.37% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.18% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.37% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.18% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.18% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.18% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.18% fail on Linkage
-
6.4% fail on
Visibility
- 3.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers
-
0.55% fail on
View to rear
- 0.37% fail on Mirrors
- 0.18% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.18% fail on Bonnet
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.55% fail on Condition
- 2.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.6% fail on
Tyres
- 2.4% fail on Tread depth
- 2.2% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Steering
-
0.92% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.73% fail on Track rod end
- 0.18% fail on Locking devices
-
0.73% fail on
Power steering
- 0.37% fail on Operation
- 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.18% fail on Other components
- 0.18% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.92% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.73% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.73% fail on Registration plates
-
0.18% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Rover 200 (1995 - 1999)
Smart styling. The Vi is quick and economical, the 1.6 CVT responsive. Feels compact in town yet comfortable on the motorway.