Rover 200 MOT Results
Registered in 199852.9% pass rate
from 1,466 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 200 is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.5% fail on Front lamps (38% better than other 1998 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (32% better than other 1998 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.95% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.14% fail on Tell tales
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Battery (96% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.9% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.14% fail on Tell tale
- 0.068% fail on Switch
-
0.82% fail on
Headlamps
(76% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Horn
- 0.068% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
17% fail on
Suspension
(14% better than other 1998 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(27% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Component mounting (35% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.068% fail on Spring mounting
-
6.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(59% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(56% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (57% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.27% fail on Drive shafts
-
6.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(56% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
0.95% fail on
Suspension arms
(73% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (74% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Attachment
- 0.68% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.55% fail on
Wheel bearings
(68% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Rear
- 0.14% fail on Front (81% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.20% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(90% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (88% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.14% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.068% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.068% fail on Condition
-
0.068% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.068% fail on Condition
-
0.068% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.068% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.068% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.068% fail on Condition
-
8.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(27% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
16% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(48% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 12% fail on Emissions (80% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.61% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.27% fail on System
- 0.20% fail on Cap
- 0.14% fail on Tank
- 0.068% fail on Pipe
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.5% fail on Rear wheels (46% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Front wheels
- 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.68% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.068% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(39% better than other 1998 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Components
(39% better than other 1998 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Pipes
- 0.41% fail on Hoses (78% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.34% fail on Leaks
- 0.068% fail on Operation
-
3.5% fail on
Components
(39% better than other 1998 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Hub components
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.14% fail on Brake discs (79% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.14% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 0.068% fail on Brake drums
-
0.82% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.82% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.20% fail on ABS (86% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.14% fail on
Pedal
- 0.068% fail on Condition
- 0.068% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.14% fail on
Pedal
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.1% fail on Wipers
- 2.3% fail on Washers
- 0.48% fail on Mirrors
- 0.20% fail on Bonnet
- 0.20% fail on Windscreen
-
6.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.41% fail on Condition
-
2.6% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(77% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (91% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.34% fail on Size/type
-
3.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(31% better than other 1998 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Body condition
-
0.89% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.89% fail on Chassis
-
0.20% fail on
Seats
- 0.20% fail on Passengers
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
(82% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Drivers
- 0.068% fail on Passengers other
-
0.14% fail on
Load security
- 0.14% fail on Bootlid (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Engine mountings
-
2.3% fail on
Steering
(49% better than other 1998 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
- 0.75% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Operation
- 0.20% fail on Other components
-
1.1% fail on
Steering system
(70% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Track rod end (65% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Steering rack (88% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Free play
- 0.068% fail on Steering rack
-
0.068% fail on
Steering control
- 0.068% fail on Steering column
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
- 0.068% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Rover 200 (1995 - 1999)
Smart styling. The Vi is quick and economical, the 1.6 CVT responsive. Feels compact in town yet comfortable on the motorway.