Rover 200 MOT Results

Registered in 1994
60.0% pass rate
from 628 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 9.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 8.1% fail on Component mounting (57% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Spring mounting
    • 6.1% fail on Drive shafts (84% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Front drive shafts (90% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 6.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (91% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 1.9% fail on Trailing arms (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.48% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.32% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.32% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.16% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.16% fail on Rear
  • 14% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (30% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Battery
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Fog lamp (71% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Headlamps (89% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp (89% better than other 1994 cars)
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.6% fail on Emissions (56% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.48% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.32% fail on Cap
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
  • 9.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.64% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.4% fail on Brakes (42% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.48% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.96% fail on Hub components
      • 0.96% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.64% fail on Hydraulic systems (89% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Components (91% better than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Pipes (91% better than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Hoses (79% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Leaks
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on ABS
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
        • 0.16% fail on Anti-slip
  • 6.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
  • 5.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.9% fail on Body condition
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 0.96% fail on Drivers
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers
    • 0.80% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.80% fail on Chassis
    • 0.48% fail on Doors
      • 0.48% fail on Drivers
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.5% fail on Steering system
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.48% fail on Power steering
      • 0.32% fail on Operation
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
  • 0.96% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.96% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages