Rover 200 MOT Results

Registered in 1994
61.9% pass rate
from 451 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (56% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.67% fail on Sub-frame (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.89% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.22% fail on Axles
      • 0.22% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.22% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.3% fail on Transmission (81% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Drive shafts (92% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Joints (97% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.44% fail on Joints
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.67% fail on Sub-frame (17 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Sub-frame condition (18 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.67% fail on Doors
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.44% fail on Door condition
      • 0.22% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition
    • 0.67% fail on Seats
      • 0.67% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.22% fail on System
    • 0.22% fail on Floor
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.67% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.89% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.44% fail on Horn
      • 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.89% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.67% fail on Headlamps (77% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (79% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% better than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% better than other 1994 cars)
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 10% fail on Exhaust emissions (48% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 10.0% fail on Spark ignition (61% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 9.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (96% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.67% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
  • 8.6% fail on Brakes
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.22% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.44% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (14 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt
          • 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.22% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.22% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.22% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.22% fail on Cable
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Valves
    • 0.22% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
  • 4.2% fail on Steering
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.22% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.8% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.8% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.44% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.22% fail on Rams
  • 4.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (62% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.22% fail on View to rear
      • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.89% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.44% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)

Search Good Garages