Rover 200 MOT Results
Registered in 199265.3% pass rate
from 147 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 200 is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
5.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.68% fail on Linkage
- 4.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.68% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint
-
2.0% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.4% fail on Sub-frame (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
5.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.68% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.4% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.4% fail on Horn
-
0.68% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.68% fail on Switch
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
6.1% fail on
Transmission
(180% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Joints
- 0.68% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.68% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.68% fail on Joints
-
5.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.68% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.68% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.68% fail on
Chassis
- 0.68% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.68% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.68% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.68% fail on
Body
- 0.68% fail on Panel
-
0.68% fail on
Seats
- 0.68% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.68% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.68% fail on Boot lid condition
-
6.1% fail on
Transmission
(180% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Brakes
-
8.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt
- 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
5.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.68% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.68% fail on Hand lever
-
8.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.4% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 3.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.68% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.68% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
8.2% fail on
Spark ignition
-
8.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.4% fail on
Visibility
- 2.7% fail on Wipers
- 0.68% fail on Washers
-
2.7% fail on
Steering
-
1.4% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.4% fail on Steering rack
-
0.68% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.68% fail on Track rod end
-
0.68% fail on
Power steering
- 0.68% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
1.4% fail on
Steering gear
-
2.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 0.68% fail on Size/type
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.68% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.68% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.68% fail on Registration plates
-
0.68% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.68% fail on Attachment