Rover 200 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
67.6% pass rate
from 238 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 5.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.84% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 5.5% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.42% fail on Couplings
        • 0.42% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.9% fail on Trailing arms (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (12 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment
    • 0.42% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.42% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment
    • 0.42% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.42% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (41% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Front lamps
    • 2.1% fail on Battery
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.84% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Fog lamp (79% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.42% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.42% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.42% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.42% fail on Lamp
    • 0.42% fail on Horn
  • 8.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
  • 7.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions
    • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
  • 5.5% fail on Brakes (62% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.42% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 0.42% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.42% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering system
      • 2.1% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.84% fail on Track rod end
  • 2.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.7% fail on Body condition
    • 0.84% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.84% fail on Chassis
  • 0.42% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages