Rover 200 MOT Results
Registered in 199267.6% pass rate
from 238 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 200 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
5.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 5.0% fail on Component mounting
- 0.84% fail on Subframe mounting
-
5.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
- 0.42% fail on Couplings
- 0.42% fail on Drive shafts
-
5.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Trailing arms
(10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (12 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Sub-frames
(5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.42% fail on Attachment
-
0.42% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.42% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.42% fail on Attachment
- 0.42% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
- 0.42% fail on Front suspension joints
-
5.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
12% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(41% better than other 1992 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.3% fail on Front lamps
- 2.1% fail on Battery
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.84% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(80% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Fog lamp (79% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.42% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.42% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.42% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.42% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.42% fail on Lamp
- 0.42% fail on Horn
-
8.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.5% fail on Washers
-
7.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.9% fail on Emissions
- 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Condition
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
5.5% fail on
Brakes
(62% better than other 1992 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Front wheels
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.42% fail on Brake imbalance
-
0.42% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.42% fail on Condition
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Tyres
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.42% fail on Size/type
-
2.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.9% fail on
Steering system
- 2.1% fail on Steering rack
- 0.84% fail on Track rod end
-
2.9% fail on
Steering system
-
2.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.7% fail on Body condition
-
0.84% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.84% fail on Chassis
-
0.42% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.42% fail on Registration plate